The Champaign-Urbana Computer Users Group

The Status Register - October, 2006


This newsletter will never appear on CUCUG.ORG before the monthly CUCUG meeting it is intended to announce. This is in deference to actual CUCUG members. They get each edition hot off the presses. If you'd like to join our group, you can get the pertinent facts by looking in the "Information About CUCUG" page. If you'd care to look at prior editions of the newsletter, they may be found via the Status Register Newsletter page.
News     Common     PC     Linux     Mac     CUCUG

October 2006


To move quickly to an article of your choice, use the search feature of your reader or the hypertext directory above. Enjoy.

October News:

The October Meeting

The next CUCUG meeting will be held on our regular third Thursday of the month: Thursday, October 19th, at 7:00 pm, at the First Baptist Church of Champaign in Savoy. The Linux SIG convenes, of course, 45 minutes earlier, at 6:15 pm. Directions to the FBC-CS are at the end of this newsletter.

The October 19 gathering will be one of our split SIG meetings. Both the Macintosh and PC SIGs are open for anything anyone wants to bring in.

ToC

Welcome New Member

We'd like to welcome the newest members of our group, joining us in the last month: Del England (Windows PC Desktop).

We welcome any kind of input or feedback from members. Run across an interesting item or tidbit on the net? Just send the link to the editor. Have an article or review you'd like to submit? Send it in. Have a comment? Email any officer you like. Involvement is the driving force of any user group. Welcome to the group.

ToC

WILL-TV to air "The Net @ Risk" on 10-18-06; PCUG meets same evening

From: "David L. Noreen" <d-noreen@uiuc.edu>

We have a PCUG meeting coming up on Wednesday of next week, the 18th. Mark Z. will be out of town, so do we have anybody who would be willing to volunteer to chair the meeting?

P.S. Here's an item I just received today from WILL-TV, where I volunteer. WILL will broadcast a Bill Moyers program on October 18th, the same night as our PCUG meeting, on the topic "The Net at Risk". (Set your VCRs before the meeting!)


Moyers on America

Journalist Bill Moyers takes on crucial issues facing the nation in three investigative documentaries.

The third, "The Net @ Risk" will air at 8 pm on Wednesday, Oct. 18. It considers how mega-media corporations could restrict the democratic possibilities of the Web's future.

As Moyers said in a recent interview:

"The third documentary, which airs on October the 18th, may well be the most important of the three, because it's been the least reported in the mainstream media, and that is a look at how the big telecommunications industry is trying to really get control of the content of the internet, not just the pipes themselves, and they want to impose toll booths on the information superhighway so that only the people -- that the people who pay the most will get ahead of the line. You'll see some interviews in that documentary -- you'll see a documentary with representatives of the Christian Coalition, the National Rifle Association, and moveon.org, who realize that if this happens, if the corporations, the telephone and cable companies succeed, they'll be able to potentially censor the content of the internet, which up until now has been free. As you know, ... the internet is the greatest democratic phenomenon of our time. And if these corporations can succeed in putting toll booths on the internet, they will change the access that we all have to it, and they will, as with radio, television and cable, stop the evolution of the internet for democratic purposes."

<http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/02/1321259>

All three documentaries can be viewed online at:

<http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/capitol/index.html>
<http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/green/index.html>
<http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/net/index.html>

ToC

Reflections Projection 2006 Computing Conference

Friday-Sunday, October 20-22, Siebel Center & DCL

from Anthony Philipp <philipp1@uiuc.edu>

The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ACM student chapter is pleased to announce the 12th Annual Reflections | Projections Student Computing Conference, to be held on the weekend of October 20-22, 2006. This year we are excited to announce many speakers from both academia and industry, including:

Kwabena Boahen

Designer of silicon neural circuits
Professor of Bioengineering, Stanford University

Adrian Bowyer

Creator of RepRap self-replicating robots Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath

Robert X. Cringely

PBS columnist and creator of "Triumph of the Nerds"

Jawed Karim

Co-founder of YouTube, UIUC alumnus

Max Levchin

Co-founder of PayPal, UIUC alumnus

Sanjay J. Patel

Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Yale N. Patt

Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Austin

In addition to speakers, this year's conference will host the following exciting events: the Reflections | Projections Job Fair on Friday, October 20, the MechMania AI programming competition and the PuzzleCrack puzzle-solving competition.

For more information, please visit the conference website at <http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/conference/>. Registration for Reflections | Projections is free, and includes a complementary conference T-shirt <http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/conference/register.php>.

ToC

Second FCC study reportedly shelved

FCC to probe suppression of media-ownership reports

By The Associated Press
September 19, 2006
URL: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=17418

WASHINGTON - Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin yesterday ordered a formal investigation into why two agency reports on media ownership were never made public.

Martin was responding to a request by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who earlier in the day made public a second FCC study that she says was shelved by agency officials.

Last week, Boxer released a draft of an FCC study that showed locally owned television stations air more news than local stations controlled by outside owners. A lawyer with the FCC told the Associated Press last week that FCC managers ordered the destruction of that report; the lawyer is no longer with the agency.

"I want to assure you that I too am concerned about what happened to these two draft reports," Martin stated in a letter sent last evening to Boxer. "I have asked the inspector general of the FCC to conduct an investigation into what happened to these draft documents and will cooperate fully with him."

Martin added that he was not chairman at the time the reports were drafted, and that neither he nor his staff had seen them.

Boxer released the second report yesterday afternoon. The FCC Media Bureau report analyzes the impact of deregulation in the radio industry. The report states that from March 1996 through March 2003, the number of commercial radio stations on the air rose 5.9% while the number of station owners fell 35%.

The intense concentration of ownership followed a 1996 rewrite of telecommunications law that eliminated a 40-station national ownership cap.

The report, apparently prepared in 2003, was never made public, nor have any similar analyses followed, despite the fact that radio-industry reports were released in 1998, 2001 and 2002, Boxer said.

In a letter to Martin sent earlier yesterday, the senator wrote, "This is the second report in a week that I have received that appears to have been shelved by officials within the FCC and I am growing more and more concerned at these developments."

Martin joined the commission in July 2001 and became chairman in March 2005. He stated he would order his staff to update the radio study and include it in the record of the commission's ongoing media-ownership review.

In her letter, Boxer asked that the agency "examine whether it was then or is now the practice of the FCC to suppress facts that are contrary to a desired outcome."

In June 2003, the commission voted to loosen rules in virtually all areas of media ownership, including cross-ownership limits on radio and television stations. But commissioners at the time were also concerned about the emergence of radio giant Clear Channel Communications Inc., which now owns about 1,200 stations.

It decided to eliminate its existing system of measuring radio markets and use one favored by Arbitron, a private firm best known for measuring ratings. The commission decided not to force broadcasters to divest stations in markets where the new boundaries would push the broadcast companies over the limit.

Most of the rules the commission voted on in 2003 were thrown out by an appeals court in Philadelphia. The agency is reconsidering them. Clear Channel is lobbying the FCC to increase the number of stations that can be owned in the nation's largest markets.

Also yesterday, the FCC extended the period allowed for public comment on the ownership proceeding by a month, from Sept. 22 to Oct. 23. A public hearing is scheduled for Oct. 3 in Los Angeles.

ToC

The Internet As Policy

Written and produced by John Anderson (mediaminutes@freepress.net)
Media Minutes: September 29, 2006
Audio: http://freepress.net/mediaminutes/archive/mm092906.mp3
Text: http://freepress.net/mediaminutes/transcripts/mm092906.pdf

The massive campaign to overhaul U.S. telecommunications law has been stalled at least until after the November elections. Free Press policy director Ben Scott says the contentious issue of network neutrality - and the fact that legislation under consideration on Capitol Hill has no meaningful provision to protect it - sealed the deal, even though phone and cable companies spent well more than $100 million dollars and worked hand- in-hand with key House and Senate members to push their agenda.

Ben Scott:"Organized people fought organized money in a battle royal and won a stalemate, which is a tremendous achievement, totally unprecedented in modern telecommunications policymaking."

However, when Congress reconvenes in a lame-duck session after the elections, there's a good chance that telecom-friendly lawmakers will try to ram through policy changes as add-ons to federal spending bills, so the fight is far from over.

Ben Scott:"There's been a lot of talk about a streamlined bill, but I actually think it's gonna be a giant bill that's attached to a spending package regardless of what they put on there."

In the meantime, the FCC plans to vote in October on whether or not to approve the merger of AT&T and BellSouth. There's a good chance that conditions could be placed on the merger to protect network neutrality, at least in the short-term. But Scott says the fate of an open Internet will ultimately be decided by Congress, and citizens must remain vigilant.

Ben Scott:"The month of October is an important time for constituents to go out and talk to their legislators. I think campaign events are an ideal time to raise the question about how a particular member of Congress is going to come down on the future of the Internet."

Internet policy is expected to remain a contentious issue, regardless of what happens in Congress after the elections. Scott says now is the time to think big about next year.

Ben Scott:"If we look at every moment in the history of the United States when we've had a sea change in technology or transportation, the government has been involved in the development of infrastructure. Whether it was the national highway system, or electrification, or constructing the telephone network, when we have an essential social service that we feel every American needs to take advantage of, the government has the policies in place to bring that service and build it out."

One estimate puts the cost of wiring the entire nation with high-speed fiber-optic lines at $115 billion, though that's less than half the money already spent on the occupation of Iraq.

ToC

Google makes video play with YouTube buy

By Tom Krazit
Story last modified Mon Oct 09 17:51:15 PDT 2006
URL: http://news.com.com/Google+makes+video+play+with+YouTube+buy/2100-1030_3-6124094.html

Google has agreed to purchase online video phenomenon YouTube for $1.65 billion in stock, the companies announced Monday.

The deal, which had been rumored for days, will dramatically improve Google's video-sharing service with one of the Internet's hottest properties in YouTube, which allows Net users to upload video clips and share them with the world, for better or worse.

<http://news.com.com/2061-11199_3-6123756.html?tag=nl>

YouTube will operate independently, and the companies will work together on building new features for independent users as well as for aspiring directors, they said in a press release. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2006.

"This is one of many investments that Google will be making to put video at the heart of a user's online experience," said Google CEO Eric Schmidt on a conference call after the deal was announced. "When we looked at the marketplace and saw what was going on, we saw a clear winner in the social networking side of video, and that's what drove us to start the conversations with YouTube."

From the YouTube side, co-founders Chad Hurley and Steve Chen described their excitement at taking advantage of Google's deep pockets and advertising contacts as they continue to build out their site. "We now have the resources to take our service to the next level," said Chen, who serves as YouTube's chief technology officer.

Google's acquisition of YouTube comes as online video is really starting to hit its stride. As more and more people have signed up for broadband Internet connections and the technology behind video-sharing services has improved, traffic to YouTube's site has skyrocketed. The site has about 45 percent of the online video market, according to recent figures from Web traffic monitor Hitwise.

Users have made a very big deal of uploading videos of themselves, sharing the minute details of their lives, dancing to popular music or, more controversially, rebroadcasting clips of popular television shows.

One early example of the phenomenon was the frenzy around the comic "Lazy Sunday" video, pulled from an airing of "Saturday Night Live." NBC first demanded that YouTube pull the sketch from its site after people flocked to the hilarious rap song featuring two mild-mannered cast members affecting gangsta-rap personas while recalling a trip to the movies to see "The Chronicles of Narnia." But YouTube later cut a deal with NBC to allow YouTube users to post content from NBC programs, and it has followed up that deal with others involving companies such as Warner Music and on Monday, Universal Music Group, Sony BMG Music Entertainment and CBS.

<http://news.com.com/NBC+strikes+deal+with+YouTube/2100-1025_3-6088617.html?tag=nl>
<http://news.com.com/YouTube+cuts+three+content+deals/2100-1030_3-6123914.html?tag=nl>

Google's heft gives YouTube more credibility in this emerging market for online video, said Josh Bernoff, an analyst with Forrester Research. "I think the combination of the greater potential to make deals and also the greater technical ability to solve copyright problems puts them in a much better position than YouTube is (in) by itself."

Around 100 million videos are available on YouTube on a given day, with 65,000 new videos added every day, according to the company's Web site. It cited numbers from Nielsen Net Ratings, claiming 20 million unique visitors a month.

All of that content requires search technology to make it easier to find exactly what users are looking for, and improving YouTube's search capabilities with Google's technology will be one of the first priorities of the merged organization. But Google also sees advertising possibilities in those numbers, said Sergey Brin, Google's co-founder and president of technology. "Video is a great medium for advertising," he said.

The companies struck an all-stock deal in order to make the transaction tax-free for the YouTube shareholders, according to David Drummond, senior vice president of corporate development for Google. Google will issue the number of shares required to complete the deal based on the 30-day average closing price of Google's stock two trading days prior to the close of the acquisition. The company's stock closed at $429 on Monday. Sequoia Partners provided the original funding for YouTube of $3.5 million in November 2005, and followed that up with a second $8 million round of funding in April.

YouTube's suitors over the last six months have, according to reports, included Microsoft, Yahoo, News Corp. and other online and traditional media giants looking to get in on the viral video craze. However, the process of trying to determine YouTube's value over the last six months reminded more than a few analysts of the dot-com bubble frenzy in the late 1990s, when companies were being purchased based on a user base and a dream, regardless of whether they were actually able to turn a profit.

<http://news.com.com/YouTube+could+be+a+steal+at+1+billion/2100-1026_3-6108971.html?tag=nl>

Google used a "synergistic" model to value YouTube, said Drummond, declining to elaborate on just exactly what that meant but acknowledging that traditional "standalone" methods of putting a price tag on the company were hard to use in this situation.

Executives pointed to the similarities between a young YouTube and a young Google as one of the reasons for the acquisition. "Everyone here knows they've built an extraordinary business and phenomenon. The thing that tipped us over was not business success or working relationships but the vision of serving users," Schmidt said.

Still, the combined organization will need to make money serving those users. The early strategy appears to be a combination of targeted advertising next to YouTube videos combined with better search technology for helping content owners identify copyright violations. "We're going to be exploring a lot of options utilizing Google's advanced ad technology that benefits the experience and helps partners monetize their content," said Hurley, YouTube's chief executive officer.

With this move, Google has launched itself ahead of competitors such as Yahoo and Microsoft in taking control of online video, Forrester's Bernoff said. "Every one of these portals now of any size has announced its own user-generated content area, it's apparently very easy to put in place, but that doesn't help much. The people at YouTube have figured out how to do this better, and I think the other portals have to implement a system similar to this to be successful," he said.

Microsoft was looking into buying something like YouTube earlier this year but eventually decided to build its own video sharing service, known as Soapbox, according to Whitney Burke, a spokeswoman for the company. "We are excited about the potential we are seeing in the beta of Soapbox on MSN and believe building our own solution is a more cost-effective way to compete in this new space," said Burke in a statement.

<http://news.com.com/Microsoft+to+take+on+YouTube/2100-1026_3-6116971.html?tag=nl>

[CNET News.com's Anne Broache contributed to this article.]

Listen up

YouTube: Google's biggest buy

After announcing a $1.65 billion purchase, Google CEO Eric Schmidt and YouTube CEO Chad Hurley look forward to what the combined company can do.

Download mp3 -
<http://chkpt.zdnet.com/chkpt/ne.audio.dl/http://podcast-files.cnet.com/podcast/google_buys_youtube.mp3> (1.42MB)

ToC

YouTube cuts three content deals

By Candace Lombardi
Story last modified Mon Oct 09 14:28:26 PDT 2006
URL: http://news.com.com/YouTube+cuts+three+content+deals/2100-1030_3-6123914.html

YouTube announced on Monday partnerships with Universal Music Group, Sony BMG Music Entertainment and CBS that let their artists' music and videos be included in original content posted on YouTube's site.

The media groups will authorize the use of their copyright-protected content through three separate revenue deals with YouTube.

As part of its deal with Universal Music Group, the video-sharing site has agreed to use new technology to filter out any unauthorized content. Universal Music Group owns multiple record labels, including Island Def Jam Music Group, Geffen Records and Verve Music Group.

Monday's announcement did not make clear when the Universal Music Group content will be available for purchase or how much it will cost. Neither YouTube nor Universal Music Group was immediately available for comment.

The Sony BMG deal will be tied to streaming ad revenue.

YouTube's deal with CBS will let people use content such as news, sports and prime-time programming from its CBS brand television channels. The deal covers technology that will allow CBS to find unauthorized content on YouTube and remove it--or choose to keep the content up and stream advertising next to it.

In mid-September, Warner Music Group signed a deal with YouTube to allow use of its music, video content, artist interviews and other original programming. Under that deal, revenue will come from ads streaming next to the videos.

Separately on Monday, Google announced that it signed a deal with Sony BMG and Warner Music Group to offer music video content via ad-supported streaming. Warner Music Group will also allow Google to offer a purchase-for-download option.

YouTube's agreement with Universal Music Group, Sony BMG and CBS comes amid a flurry of rumors regarding YouTube's possible sale to companies such as Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Viacom and News Corp.

<http://news.com.com/2061-12572_3-6123401.html?tag=nl>

YouTube is valued for the vast number of viewers it has managed to attract, in much the same way social-networking site MySpace, owned by News Corp., has developed a large user base. However, YouTube's growing popularity has been accompanied by scrutiny over the unauthorized inclusion of copyright content in many of the videos posted to the site. Concern over copyright issues has led many analysts to question YouTube's long-term viability.

<http://news.com.com/MySpace+drawing+older+visitors%2C+study+finds/2100-1026_3-6123266.html?tag=nl>
<http://news.com.com/Analysts+dont+like+YouTubes+chances/2100-1030_3-6121902.html?tag=nl>

ToC

Report: Five involved in HP pretexting case expected to be indicted

Posted by Greg Sandoval
October 4, 2006 9:57 AM PDT
URL: http://news.com.com/2061-10796_3-6122646.html

Patricia Dunn, Hewlett-Packard's embattled former chairman and four others involved in spying on journalists HP employees and board members, will be indicted Wednesday by California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, according to a published report.

The others expected to be indicted are Kevin T. Hunsaker, HP's former senior lawyer; Ronald DeLia, a private detective; Joseph DePante, owner of Action Research Group, a data-brokering company; and Bryan Wagner, a Colorado man believed to have been an employee of Action Research, according to a story in the New York Times.

The report says that the five will be accused of four felony charges: using of false or fraudulent pretenses to obtain confidential information from a public utility, unauthorized access to computer data, identity theft, and conspiracy to commit each of those crimes, the Times reported.

---

About the author:

Greg Sandoval covers media and digital entertainment.

ToC

Apple Reports on Options Backdating Problems

by Glenn Fleishman <glenn@tidbits.com>
article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8699>
URL: TidBITS#850/09-Oct-06

Steve Jobs apologized last week while announcing the results of an internal investigation regarding Apple's backdating of stock options, in which options were granted on a preferentially low stock price date instead of the date upon which the grant was decided. Jobs said that no current management was involved in backdating options, which occurred on 15 dates between 1997 and 2002.

<http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2006/oct/04investigation.html>

Separately, Apple's former chief financial officer, Fred Anderson, resigned from the Apple board, on which he had served after leaving his executive position in 2004. While Apple stated that two unnamed former officers of the company were involved in backdating stock, it made no connection between Anderson resigning and that statement. As CFO, Anderson would theoretically have been involved in accounting for options, but in other Silicon Valley firms that are being looked at for the same charges, officers other than the CFO and some lower-level executives handled or manipulated the mechanics to avoid general oversight.

Apple said that Jobs was not the beneficiary of any of these grants, but he was aware of some of them. However, the firm said that he was "unaware of the accounting implications," which is not an unreasonable statement. Jobs wouldn't be involved in the day-to-day work of issuing options and reconciling them on the books.

If the material Apple provides to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) meets with its approval, Apple may be out of the woods with no real repercussions. The company will need to restate earnings, but because stock options are involved, that won't involve any change in its cash positions. It's possible Apple might be required to pay minor fines to the SEC, as well.

The two former executives could face separate actions, even if Apple faces none, and could be prosecuted on criminal offenses, barred from serving as officers in public companies, be fined, or experience none of the above. Without knowing their particular actions, there's no way to predict that outcome.

The backdating scandal involves stock options, which are the right but not the requirement to purchase stock at a given price, typically on or after a certain date, or during a date range. Companies issue options to employees and others to reward them if the company's stock increases above the strike price of the option, or the price at which it was granted.

Exercising an option means paying the option price, which can be zero, a few pennies a share, or much higher. With the stock options exercised, you own actual stock, but may face restrictions on selling that stock. (Some companies, like Microsoft, have bypassed options grants largely or entirely, and simply give employees stock, which may also have limitations on when it can be sold.)

When stock options are backdated, companies choose the date on which the stock price was at its lowest in a given quarter or a longer period, and then backdate the option grant to that date. One recent report revealed that a firm had issued options to an employee after his death, backdated to when he was still alive, in order to benefit his estate.

This practice is not illegal if fully disclosed. In the companies being looked at, the accounting didn't include the correct liability for these options, tax liabilities were overlooked, and other reporting was omitted. While little or no cash changes hands between a company and an option grantee, issuing options and subsequently having them exercised changes the amount of stock a company possesses, and thus - among other factors - changes its capability to raise cash or issue options in the future and dilutes the stock in the general marketplace.

Dozens of firms were caught up in the revelation of this practice, which typically occurred in the late 1990s up to 2002, during the dot-com era when stock options went from a typically long-term proposition for gain to quick, meteoric run-ups. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 changed the landscape because it requires stock options to be reported within two days of being issued. Previously, companies reported months or even more than a year after issuing options, allowing time to rejigger the dates. Reports show that many reports are still being filed late, however.

Stock option backdating is a big deal. Entire management teams at some firms have been forced to resign. Indictments have been flying. Restatements of income on the order of billions have already happened. Back taxes will often be owed, as well. So far, the SEC is investigating on the order of 80 companies. Some have made a clean breast of their practices and issued reports; others have resisted and may face full-scale SEC lawsuits as a result.

<http://www.edn.com/article/CA6338353.html>

Is this a black eye for Apple? Absolutely. Apple's accounting folks have up to this point had clean hands and generally received good marks for how they report financial results. Unless further investigation should reveal more than this first report, however, Apple has limited the risk of further problems, and Steve Jobs will remain in his exalted role.

ToC

Scandal Grows Over Backdating Of Options

By Frank Ahrens
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 12, 2006; D01
URL: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/11/AR2006101100425.html

The heads of three well-known technology companies lost their jobs this week as the result of a scandal sweeping through the business world over the improper backdating of stock options, a practice often designed to inflate the value of stock grants to employees.

Internet news publisher Cnet Networks Inc., security software firm McAfee Inc. and online recruitment service Monster Worldwide Inc. announced the resignation or retirement of their chief executives, all apparently over concerns about how the companies granted stock options.

The three are the latest of at least 135 companies to acknowledge or be investigated for backdating stock options, which typically involves picking dates for stock grants when the purchase price was low, so that when the stock is sold, the holder can make more money. The practice is not illegal as long as the options are properly accounted for on company earnings sheets and tax returns.

According to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department, however, a number of companies have not followed the rules. Federal authorities have filed fraud charges against executives at two technology companies, and they continue to investigate many firms.

The investigations are sending shock waves through the tech community, where stock options have long been a key tool for luring talent to start-ups.

"The primary concern in [Silicon] Valley is how many CEOs will be fired, and how many will be indicted," said Kirk O. Hanson, executive director of the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University.

Though the scandal lacks Enron's hubris or Tyco's Saturnalian excess, the consequences are grave: Cnet founder Shelby W. Bonnie resigned yesterday as chief executive and apologized for his role in the backdating options. The company issued an internal report that said Cnet backdated options from 1996 through 2003 and partially blamed Bonnie.

Also yesterday, McAfee fired its president, Kevin Weiss, and announced that chief executive George Samenuk was retiring. Earlier in the week, Monster's chief executive, Andrew J. McKelvey, resigned. Last week, Apple Computer Inc. announced the resignation of board member Fred D. Anderson over stock option issues.

Though many of the higher-profile companies under scrutiny are tech firms in Silicon Valley, the SEC and Justice Department are casting their nets widely, investigating companies as varied as Home Depot Inc. and Cheesecake Factory Inc. The SEC said in testimony to Congress last month that it is investigating more than 100 companies for possible fraudulent reporting of option grants.

"As the use of options compensation has increased, however, so apparently has its abuse," SEC enforcement director Linda Thompson testified. "This practice benefits employees at the expense of shareholders."

Former Comverse Technology Inc. chief executive Kobi Alexander is awaiting extradition from Namibia on federal charges related to his company's options practices. Former Brocade Communications Systems Inc. chief executive Gregory L. Reyes also faces federal charges.

How does backdating work?

Companies have long issued stock options to their employees to motivate them. Options allow an employee to buy a certain number of company shares at a price set by management, usually the price the day the option is granted.

The employee makes the most profit by buying stock options at a low price and selling them when the stock market has pumped up the company's stock to a higher price. If a company backdates options, it typically allows the employee to buy options when the stock was at its lowest point, thereby increasing the profit when the stock is sold.

Options usually are granted to a company's highest executives as part of their compensation packages. Backdating has been criticized as a shady way for wealthy executives to get wealthier, even if the company performs poorly.

The process is not illegal if no company documents have been forged, if the other shareholders have been informed and if the backdated options are correctly accounted for in company earnings and tax returns.

It may be legal, but it's "slimy," said Nell Minow, co-founder of the Corporate Library, a corporate-governance watchdog. "It subverts the whole justification for options," she said.

Minow was in New York yesterday lecturing corporate directors on a number of topics, including backdated options.

"No one comes to you and says, 'Let's backdate our options,' " she said. A company's human resources department "will tell an employee, 'We have a great benefit with our options -- a 60-day look-back.' That doesn't sound quite so dirty."

Backdating has cost some companies more than their chief executives. Many have had to restate earnings and take charges on upcoming earnings to account for the improperly recorded options.

For example, in August, Clorox Co. said it took a $25 million pretax charge in its most recent quarter to account for "errors" in how the company accounted for options. Research in Motion Ltd., maker of the BlackBerry, said last month that a review of its options-accounting practices could reduce past earnings by as much as $45 million. Also last month, chipmaker Broadcom Corp. said it would restate earnings to take $1.5 billion worth of options expenses off its books.

[Staff writers Sara Kehaulani Goo and Yuki Noguchi contributed to this report.]

ToC

Spamhaus.org faces threat to its domain name

Posted by Declan McCullagh
October 10, 2006 8:49 AM PDT
URL: http://news.com.com/2061-10796_3-6124309.html

A U.S. company accused of being a spammer is escalating its legal fight against Spamhaus, a British organization that maintains a blacklist of junk e-mailers.

e360 Insight, which filed suit against Spamhaus in federal court in Illinois, on October 6 asked U.S. District Judge Charles Kocoras to delete the spamhaus.org domain name.

e360 has proposed that be done by ordering the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, and registrar Tucows, to suspend the registration for the domain (PDF). While e360 claims to be a "responsible, opt-in marketer," Spamhaus has posted examples of junk e-mail that appears to originate from the company.

The case is somewhat unusual because Spamhaus initially participated in the suit to defend itself, and then intentionally dropped out on the theory that a British organization shouldn't have to worry about a U.S. lawsuit. That resulted in a $11.7 million default judgment against it last month.

If e360 gets its way and ICANN and Tucows are forced to delete the domain name of a non-U.S. group, the result would likely renew concerns about a U.S.-dominated Internet and spur calls for reform.

But Jonathan Zittrain, who teaches Internet law at Oxford University, says that result is a long way off. For instance, Kocoras may not sign the order. Or Tucows and ICANN could intervene in the proceedings and try to head off being required to delete the domain name.

"There's some chance this could turn out to be more than mildly interesting, but I don't see any reason to think it's some grave event for cyberspace," Zittrain said in a mailing list discussion.

For its part, Spamhaus says: "We think it can not actually happen, due to the effect it would have both on the Internet and on millions of users. We believe a government agency would have to step in before it happened."

There's another option for Spamhaus, even if it loses in U.S. court. It could quickly switch to a U.K.-based domain that would be less vulnerable to the federal court system.

---

About the author:

Declan McCullagh
chronicles the intersection of politics and technology from Washington, DC.

Related story:

ICANN: Sorry, we can't delete Spamhaus.org's domain -
<http://news.com.com/2061-10796_3-6124737.html>

ToC

Sportingbet cashes out of U.S.

Posted by Harry Fuller
October 13, 2006 9:05 AM PDT
URL: http://news.com.com/2061-10796_3-6125684.html

British-based gambling corporation Sportingbet sold its online operations in the U.S. For $1.

One press report in the Washington Post failed to note the anti-online gambling law in the U.S. recently signed into being by President George W. Bush. The new regulations were contained in a port security law.

Sportingbet may have lost its taste for profitable operations in the U.S. after its CEO was arrested on a Louisiana warrant for illegal gambling. That CEO is now back in the U.K. and presumably has cancelled all future trips to Louisiana. Sportingbet once got 60 percent of its total revenue from U.S. online gambling.

As CNET News.com reported this week, the new anti-online gambling laws may not go unchallenged. Another British company, PokerStars, claims its online poker games in the U.S. are games of skill, not chance, and therefore exempt from the port security law and its anti-gaming clauses. Sounds like that may be a prelude to a court date. PokerStars says it will continue to welcome American players. Looks like they're gambling on winning a legal bet.

About the author:

Harry Fuller escaped from television work to be executive editor at CNET News.com.

ToC

Sony issues global li-ion battery recall

by Jacqui Cheng
9/28/2006 1:46:55 PM
URL: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060928-7858.html

Sony has finally bitten the bullet and issued a worldwide recall of all Sony-manufactured lithium-ion batteries used in notebook computers. Earlier in the day, Lenovo/IBM joined the ranks of Dell, Apple, and Toshiba in issuing a recall for all Sony batteries that ship with their notebooks.

The Tokyo-based electronics manufacturer says that the recall is to address concerns regarding "recent overheating incidents," and that they are working with the Consumer Product Safety Commission to formulate a plan for the recall. They cite microscopic metal particles that enter the battery during the manufacturing process as the reason for the battery failures. The particles, they say, come into contact with other parts of the battery cell, causing the battery to short-circuit. Sony claims that these batteries would normally just power off, but in "rare cases" may overheat and cause flames.

Indeed, flames have been the result of many Sony battery malfunctions in the news lately, most recently from a Lenovo ThinkPad bursting into flames at a Los Angeles airport just last week. Such dramatic incidents happening in airports or-even worse-in-flight have passengers and airlines getting antsy, with three airlines now putting wide restrictions on laptop use due to the recalls. Virgin Atlantic recently eased their restrictions on Dell and Apple laptops to just those whose batteries fit the list.

Between Dell, Apple, Toshiba, and Lenovo, the number of recalled batteries worldwide is climbing past 7 million. Sony, being one of the largest lithium-ion battery manufacturers in the world, undoubtedly supplies other vendors (not to mention themselves) aside from those under the recall, so that number is sure to climb. Sony says that they plan to consult with OEM customers who wish to participate in the recall, so if your battery is a Sony that hasn't already been exchanged, keep an eye out for information through your notebook manufacturer. When are those battery standards coming again?

ToC

Dell To Build Indian PC Plant In 2007

By Reuters
09.22.06
URL: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,2019332,00.asp?kc=PCRSS04029TX1K0000633

BANGALORE, Sept 22 (Reuters) - Dell Inc., the world's largest maker of personal computers, said on Friday it would set up manufacturing operations in India in the first half of 2007.

The company will invest $30 million over five years in the plant, which would be set up in Sriperumbudur, on the outskirts of Chennai in southern India, an official at its Indian unit said.

"We will start with a production capacity of 400,000 units and quickly ramp up to much higher numbers," Rajan Anandan, Dell India's vice-president and general manager, told reporters.

The manufacturing plant, which will be sixth for Dell globally, will employ 1,100 people, he said.

It has two manufacturing sites in China and one in Malaysia in the region, where demand for computer hardware is soaring due to relatively lower penetration rates compared with western markets.

Dell, which competes with IBM and Hewlett-Packard Co. and local firms HCL Infosystems Ltd. and Wipro Ltd., said the new facility would help it raise its share in the Indian market from 7 percent.

The company's revenue in India rose 63 percent in April-June to about $100 million from the same quarter last year, he said.

"We are building this factory with the simple objective of accelerating our growth in India. We will start with manufacturing desktop products and over a period of time we will expand our product line," he said.

Dell already employs 12,000 people in India across its three business segments-call centre operations, research and development activities, and computer and server sales business.

The company said in March it planned to increase its staff in India to 20,000 over the next three years to tap opportunities in Asia's fourth-largest economy that is a growing market for desktops and laptops.

Sales of desktop computers in India grew 27 percent in the year to March 2006 to over 4.6 million units and it is forecast to surpass 5.6 million units in 2006/07.

There is strong demand for computers from the fast-growing banking, financial services, telecoms and information technology industries that are automating business processes and setting up nationwide IT networks.

Falling prices, cheaper finance and rising salaries are also fuelling retail demand.

ToC

Eudora goes open source

from the TidBITS Talk Discussion List

I'm very excited to hear that Qualcomm is going to put Eudora functionality into Thunderbird.

Thunderbird is a great email program, but lack some of the polish and refinement of other email clients. With a solid corporate sponsor behind it (that is to say a paid developer or three), I think it could make some real headway.

And dare I dream... it might get the ability to use the MacOS X address book?


There's a nice benefit now - Eudora is now just $20. Good opportunity to upgrade to the full version nut it's a temporary benefit. When the open source version is available, they will cease to sell it so it may or may not be worth it. FAQ says: "The open source version of Eudora is targeted for release in the first half of calendar year 2007 and will be free of charge."

FAQ: http://www.eudora.com/faq/

Download and purchase: http://www.eudora.com/download/


Qualcomm gives Eudora into Open Source, teams with Mozilla to create a free Eudora based upon Mozilla Thunderbird.

Will it be called Thundora or rather Eudobird (as a valued member of one of my mailing lists suspected)?

BTW I wonder why I haven't read anything here already about this, given that Adam is THE Eudora expert in the solar system ;-)

[We mentioned it in ExtraBITS: <http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx/.3c804d7a> -Joe]

<http://www.eudora.com/press/2006/eudora-mozilla_final_10.11.06.html>

<http://www.mozilla.com/press/mozilla-2006-10-11.html>

<http://www.eudora.com/faq/>

ToC

Common Ground:

The FCC's Public Hearing In Los Angeles

Written and produced by John Anderson (mediaminutes@freepress.net)
Media Minutes: October 6, 2006
Audio: http://freepress.net/mediaminutes/archive/mm100606.mp3
Text: http://freepress.net/mediaminutes/transcripts/mm100606.pdf

When the Federal Communications Commission came to Los Angeles on October 3rd to hold its first public hearings on media consolidation, it got a very good taste of public sentiment on the subject. A thousand people showed up to the forums and expressed the near-unanimous opinion that more concentration of ownership involving newspapers, radio and TV stations and networks is unhealthy for democracy.

The proximity to Hollywood guaranteed that the FCC would hear from many in the TV, movie, and music industries. Patric Verrone, president of the Writers Guild of America - West, told the Commissioners that consolidation among TV production companies - many of whom are now directly owned by networks - is directly responsible for copycat trends in programming.

Patric Verrone:"The palpable effect of consolidation on TV writers like myself has been to reduce them to only express those ideas acceptable to this corporate voice. Homogenization is good for milk, but bad for ideas."

Vin DiBona, the brainchild behind "America's Funniest Home Videos," lamented the fact that these developments have all but decimated the ability for new writers and producers to practice their craft.

Vin DiBona:"Where will they be able to tell their stories? What will excite them enough so that they see a future in our business? It's really not there."

Mike Mills, the bassist for the band R.E.M., told the FCC that a hyper-concentrated radio industry makes it increasingly difficult for new artists to break into the mainstream and make a living, which hurts both musicians and their potential fans.

Mike Mills:"As you undertake your review of whether to revise ownership rules, the FCC should perhaps heed the Hippocratic Oath: first, do no harm. This is about more than some scruffy musicians getting their songs on the radio - this is about control and flow of information on the public's airwaves."

Other media workers, like Susan Joyce, noted that even though the hearings were packed, many people stayed away for fear of losing their jobs by speaking out.

Susan Joyce:"There are so few participants in the media landscape that our members are afraid to speak out publicly in a way that would displease the five multinational conglomerates that create the cultural output of our country. We are losing our voices."

Concerned citizen Michelle Murphy observed that if the sentiments expressed in L.A. represent the majority view, the FCC has no justification for making a bad situation worse.

Michelle Murphy: "You listen to the people here, there's no one that said, 'Hey, media consolidation. That's great stuff, let's do a lot more of it.' But, apparently that's what you're considering doing. I don't quite - I don't quite get it."

One regulatory principle that seems to have been lost in the shuffle is the FCC's mandate to regulate the media in the public interest. Sharon Hall wasted no words in reminding the Commissioners of that fact.

Sharon Hall: "You are charged by law to pursue the public interest, not corporate interest. I urge you to obey the law."

The FCC has promised to hold at least five more public hearings on media ownership, though it closes public comment on this part of the proceeding at the end of the month.


Related Links:

FCC Public Hearing on Media Ownership, October 3rd (part 1, RealAudio required)

FCC Public Hearing on Media Ownership, October 3rd (part 2, Real Audio required)

L.A. City Beat: Too Big Already

ToC

Survey Finds Benefits, Hurdles in the Internet's Future

Originally Aired: September 26, 2006
URL: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/media/july-dec06/internet_09-26.html

In a new Pew Internet and American Life Project survey, leading technology thinkers, business people, and activists agreed that the Internet will bring both great promise and problems in the year 2020. Lee Raine, the director of the Pew Project, discusses the poll.

Lee Rainie: We asked Internet experts, technology officials, about their predictions for the future. We gave them seven scenarios to judge and asked them to agree or disagree with the evolution of those scenarios. And we found these people by doing extensive background research on who are the smart people who had done commenting on the Internet many years ago.

[Editor's Note: Check out the like for the full text and video of this discussion.]

ToC

For a Voter's Consideration

As we move into election season, it is important that voters - all voters - examine how technology is impacting our democracy. Here are a couple of items for your examination. In particular, everyone should view the video at the Princeton site. It's an eye opener.

Security Analysis of the Diebold AccuVote-TS Voting Machine

Center For Information Technology Policy
Princeton University
URL: http://itpolicy.princeton.edu/voting/

Ariel J. Feldman, J. Alex Halderman, and Edward W. Felten

This paper presents a fully independent security study of a Diebold AccuVote-TS voting machine, including its hardware and software. We obtained the machine from a private party. Analysis of the machine, in light of real election procedures, shows that it is vulnerable to extremely serious attacks. For example, an attacker who gets physical access to a machine or its removable memory card for as little as one minute could install malicious code; malicious code on a machine could steal votes undetectably, modifying all records, logs, and counters to be consistent with the fraudulent vote count it creates. An attacker could also create malicious code that spreads automatically and silently from machine to machine during normal election activities - a voting-machine virus. We have constructed working demonstrations of these attacks in our lab. Mitigating these threats will require changes to the voting machine's hardware and software and the adoption of more rigorous election procedures.

And these:

"Hotel Minibar" Keys Open Diebold Voting Machines

Monday September 18, 2006 by Ed Felten

Like other computer scientists who have studied Diebold voting machines, we were surprised at the apparent carelessness of Diebold's security design. It can be hard to convey this to nonexperts, because the examples are technical. To security practitioners, the use of a fixed, unchangeable encryption key and the blind acceptance of every software update offered on removable storage are rookie mistakes; but nonexperts have trouble appreciating this. Here is an example that anybody, expert or not, can appreciate:

The access panel door on a Diebold AccuVote-TS voting machine - the door that protects the memory card that stores the votes, and is the main barrier to the injection of a virus - can be opened with a standard key that is widely available on the Internet.

<http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1064>

Refuting Diebold's Response

Wednesday September 20, 2006 by Ed Felten

Diebold issued a response to our e-voting report. While we feel our paper already addresses all the issues they raise, here is a point by point rebuttal. Diebold's statement is in italics, our response in normal type.

<http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1065>

ToC

Blu-ray disc lurches to 50GB

By The Hollywood Reporter
Story last modified Mon Oct 09 06:41:13 PDT 2006
URL: http://news.com.com/Blu-ray+disc+lurches+to+50GB/2100-1041_3-6123837.html

Consumers will have access to the first 50GB Blu-ray disc, which boasts twice the capacity of a regular disc, when Sony Pictures releases the Adam Sandler comedy "Click" on Tuesday.

The dual-layer disc promises to deliver the interactivity and extras that backers of the next-generation, high-definition optical-disc format had been promising since the first movies were released in the format in June. Sony made the announcement Friday at the High Def 101 Conference in Los Angeles.

<http://news.com.com//Sony+to+deliver+Blu-ray+titles+June+20/2110-1025_3-6083441.html?tag=nl>
<http://news.com.com//2061-10802_3-6123639.html?tag=nl>
<http://dw.com.com/redir?destUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fhighdef.dvdconferences.com%2Fhighdefdvd%2Fv42%2Findex.cvn&siteId=3&oId=/2061-10802_3-6123639.html&ontId=1040&lop=nl.ex>

"Click" is one of three 50GB Blu-ray discs in the studio's pipeline. The others are Ridley Scott's "Black Hawk Down," coming Nov. 14, and "Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby," due Dec. 12.

Only two other studios have announced 50GB discs: 20th Century Fox is releasing "Kingdom of Heaven" on Nov. 14, and Lionsgate is preparing a dual-layer Blu-ray Disc of "The Descent" for a December release. Warner Bros. is expected to announce that its next wave of Blu-ray titles, hitting stores Oct. 31, will include one or more dual-layer discs.

Because of its greater capacity, the Blu-ray disc of "Click" will include all the bonus features from the DVD, in high-definition, as well as uncompressed PCM (pulse code modulation) audio.

Bonus features include an audio commentary with star Adam Sandler, director Frank Coraci, executive producer Tim Herlihy and writer Steve Koren; four deleted scenes; and seven short features, including a documentary on the film's special effects and a "Director's Take."

"Black Hawk" will be the first title to feature Sony's new "Blu-Wizard" playlist technology, which lets viewers customize the way they watch special features. Extras include an audio commentary with author Mark Bowden, screenwriter Ken Nolan, producer Jerry Bruckheimer, director Scott and U.S. Special Forces Veterans '93 as well as six making-of documentaries exploring various aspects of the movie's production.

"Talladega" comes with nine deleted and extended scenes, all in high-definition; an audio commentary with director Adam McKay and others; bonus race footage; a gag reel; three interviews; "Ricky & Cal" commercials and PSAs; a short feature on Will Ferrell returning to Talladega; and various other extras.

Meanwhile, Warner has slashed its projections for HD DVD and Blu-ray < http://news.com.com//Next-gen+DVD+war+could+be+messy-or+not/2100-1041_3- 6106111.html?tag=nl> disc sales projections because of a slower-than-expected rollout of
hardware and software.

As of Sept. 30, consumers had spent $25 million on the three HD players in the market--two HD DVD units from Toshiba, priced at $499 and $799, and one Blu-ray disc player, from Samsung, priced at $999--and $5 million on software, said Steve Nickerson, senior vice president of market management at Warner Home Video.

But with a second Blu-ray player from Panasonic <http://news.com.com//Panasonic+to+ deliver+the+Blu-ray+living+room/2100- 1041_3-6086986.html?tag=nl> now on the market and players from Philips, Sony and Pioneer expected within a month--as well as two next-generation HD-DVD players from Toshiba--spending should increase significantly, he said.

Warner projects that by year's end, consumers will have spent $750 million on hardware and $150 million on software for total spending of $900 million. Earlier in the year, the studio was projecting sales of $1.1 billion to $2.2 billion.

Still, Nickerson said, the studio believes the two high-definition disc formats will catch on with the public even faster than DVD because all three platforms for viewing--set-top, computer and video game console--are available in the first year. With DVD, the first computers equipped with DVD drives shipped in late 1998, more than a year after the format launched, while the first game console that could play DVDs was the PlayStation 2, which launched in November 2000.

By year's end, Nickerson said, WHV projects that there will be 1.7 million high-definition playback devices in consumer homes: 500,000 dedicated HD DVD or Blu-ray Disc set-top players, 1 million game consoles (PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360) and 200,000 computers with high-definition disc drives.

ToC

PCI Express 2.0 nears completion

By Stephen Shankland
Story last modified Mon Oct 09 16:29:13 PDT 2006
URL: http://news.com.com/PCI+Express+2.0+nears+completion/2100-1006_3-6123758.html

A two-month clock has begun ticking for the release of PCI Express 2.0, an update designed to help the ubiquitous computer communication technology with virtualization, power management and high-end graphics cards.

PCI Express, version 1.0 of which arrived in 2003, lets customers plug devices such as network adapters into computers. PCI Express 2.0 brings a bevy of changes, starting with a speed boost, according to the PCI Special Interest Group (PCI-SIG) that governs the technology.

<http://news.com.com/PCI+Express+to+usher+in+PC+changes/2100-1008_3-985809.html?tag=nl>

The PCI-SIG has released a penultimate edition of the basic PCI Express 2.0 specification to its members in version for comments, and the final version is due after a 60-day comment period, the group plans to announce Monday.

PCI Express differs from conventional PCI, its predecessor, in using a smaller number of high-speed serial communication links rather than a larger number of parallel communication lines that send data synchronized in lockstep.

The central feature of the base version of PCI Express 2.0 is a speed boost. It doubles each serial line's data transfer rate from 2.5 gigabits per second to 5Gpbs.

But future enhancements also are in the works. One will support high-end graphics cards that slurp 225 or 300 watts of power, said The 451 Group analyst Greg Quick in a report Friday.

A feature called Input-Output Virtualization (IOV) will make it easier for multiple virtual machines, each with its own operating system, to share PCI devices such as network cards.

And the PCI Express Cable specification will let PCI devices be connected not just with plug-in slots but also with standardized copper cables as long as 10 meters with data transfer speeds of 2.5Gbps per line. The technology is suited for tasks such as adding an input-output expansion module housing numerous network cards to a higher-end server.

Finally, a longer-term effort, code-named Geneseo, will let coprocessor cards such as graphics or encryption accelerators be tightly connected to central processors.

<http://news.com.com/Intel+opens+up+chip+connections/2100-1006_3-6120237.html?tag=nl>

ToC

The PC Section:

WinInfo Short Takes

Paul Thurrott
URL: http://www.wininformant.com/

Microsoft Changes Vista for European Union (EU), South Korean Markets

Citing "constructive dialog" with antitrust regulators in Europe and South Korea, Microsoft announced today that it would make changes to Vista in those markets. The changes will let consumers easily remove Microsoft middleware and replace it with third-party solutions, and Microsoft said it will ship Vista globally and not delay it in Europe because of antitrust concerns. What Microsoft isn't doing, of course, is altering Vista's security features--a more recent concern for some of Microsoft's security software partners and competitors. Mark your calendars, folks. Vista is finally headed for the finish line.

Yes, Gartner (er, Virginia), Microsoft Will Ship Vista on Schedule

Sorry Gartner, but it's official

"Microsoft today confirmed that it is on track to deliver Windows Vista for worldwide availability to its volume license business customers in November and worldwide general availability in January," reads a Microsoft press release. In other words, hold the jokes about Microsoft not being able to ship timely products. As scheduled, Microsoft is going to release Vista to manufacturing some time this month--the internal date is October 25, although that date could slip to as far back as November 8--and roll out the product according to the schedule that the company revealed early this year. Since the release of Microsoft's Vista schedule, analysts at Gartner have made themselves look silly twice by predicting that Microsoft would never meet its deadline.

Vista Licensing Changes Rile Analysts, Won't Affect Many Users

If there's no such thing as bad press, Microsoft should be ecstatic about this article. This week, the software giant quietly unveiled changes to its Vista licensing terms, and a corporate blog carefully pointed out only a couple of changes--one positive and one previously known. But after looking over the changes, several reporters and bloggers discovered that Microsoft had in fact made some sweeping changes to the Vista retail license terms. The most controversial is a clause that lets users reassign a Vista license to a different computer only one time. Previously, Microsoft implicitly allowed multiple license reassignments. Enthusiasts are crying foul, but I have to wonder how many people this change will really affect. Sure, the Ed Botts of the world will milk this change for all the anti-Microsoft bile they can, but honestly, are huge numbers of people really reassigning single copies of Windows XP to multiple machines regularly? Most people (90 percent, maybe more?) obtain Windows when they buy a new PC. And those versions of Windows couldn't be reassigned to new PCs even under the previous licensing terms. So, to take advantage of the new Vista licensing clause, you'd need to buy a retail copy of the "full" version of XP, build your own PC, install XP, and later build another completely new PC, uninstall XP from the first computer, and reinstall it on the new computer. And then do it again. And again. And again. Under Vista, you get to do that only once. But how common is that scenario, really? My point is simple: Yes, this change will adversely affect a very small minority of (admittedly vocal) Windows users. But since so few people buy retail copies of Windows, and even fewer reinstall those copies on a second computer, and even fewer still install them on further computers down the line, it won't really affect many people. So the controversy is really one of the press' making. It's a non-event for the general public.

About Buying a PC for Vista Now

You know, there's nothing like the experience of waking up on Christmas morning, looking under the tree, and finding a coupon for a product that won't ship until January. That's the Christmas that Microsoft is envisioning for Vista fans this year, and I think it stinks. If Vista will be ready for volume-license customers in November, it should also be ready for consumers in time for the holidays. But the real reason that Vista isn't shipping until January is that Microsoft's PC-maker partners would cry foul. They don't want people buying Vista this holiday season. They want people to buy new PCs with Vista preinstalled. And because Microsoft distributes far more copies of Windows with new PCs than it could ever sell at retail, there's no reason to get its PC-maker partners up in arms. So, spread that holiday cheer and sleep tight knowing that Microsoft's partners, at least, are taken care of.

Merry Christmas, Microsoft Fans: Microsoft Preps Holiday Vista Coupons

Later this month, Microsoft will publicly unveil a program called Express Upgrade that will allow customers who purchase Windows XP-based PCs between October 26, 2006, and March 15, 2007, to get a copy of Vista at a reduced price or for free. The program, naturally, is designed to ensure that PC sales won't suffer during the crucial holiday-selling period, since Vista is arriving in January, or about a month after the holiday selling period ends. Under terms of the program, customers who purchase a PC with Windows XP Home Edition will be able to upgrade to Windows Vista Home Basic for $49 or to Vista Home Premium for $79. Customers who purchase PCs with XP Professional, XP Professional x64 Edition, XP Tablet PC Edition, or XP Media Center Edition will get Vista Home Premium for free. Seems fair, and remember that customers who have Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, or Vista Business will be able to upgrade to Vista Ultimate directly from within the OS.

Windows XP SP1 Fades into the Sunset

On October 10, Microsoft will stop supporting Windows XP Service Pack 1 (SP1). Frankly, I find it hard to believe that anyone is still using XP SP1. But for those who are, Microsoft released a much-improved SP2 a whopping two years ago (has it really been that long?) and you might consider installing over the weekend. Just a thought.

Microsoft Will Ship 1 Vista DVD

According to plan, Microsoft has apparently confirmed that all Vista product versions will ship with the exact same DVD. The only difference will be the product key: A Windows Vista Ultimate product key will let you install Vista Ultimate, and a Vista Business product key will let you install Vista Business, and so on. Microsoft's shipping Vista this way so that it can support in-place upgrades from Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, and Vista Business to various other versions through a Web-based upgrade. You'll have all the bits necessary for an upgrade right on your previously purchased DVD, so all you'll need to do is fork over a credit card number, insert the disc, and upgrade. It's a simple plan. It would have been even simpler had Microsoft shipped just a single version of its OS, as Apple does.

ToC

News: IE7 Final Coming This Month

URL: http://board.iexbeta.com/index.php?showtopic=66534

The final release of IE7 is fast approaching...and I mean really fast...and will be delivered to customers via Automatic Updates a few weeks after it's available for download. We want to ensure that you are ready and the information below will help get you there.

Compatibility with sites, extensions and applications has been a very high priority for us as we develop new features, enhance the existing features and move the platform forward to be more secure and standards compliant. We are continually listening to feedback from our customers, partners and leaders in the industry to resolve major compatibility issues to ensure our common customers have a great experience with IE7. As we make key improvements in areas such as layout and security, some changes need to be made by site owners to work smoothly with IE7. We have produced detailed documentation, tools and other resources to assist site, extension and application owners in their testing and development efforts to ensure they are compatible with IE7. We have also proactively worked with hundreds of companies to resolve issues that were reported through our beta testing to ensure those issues were resolved before IE7 is released.

Update: The final release of Internet Explorer 7 is targeted for release October 18th and will be delivered to customers via Automatic Updates starting November 1st, a few weeks after it's available for download.

Read More: http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/ archive/2006/10/06/IE7-Is-Coming-This-Month_2E002E002E00_Are-you- Ready_3F00_.aspx

ToC

Intel to Launch Quad-Core Chips on November 13

HP workstations will be among first to get Intel's quad-core processors. Ben Ames, IDG News Service
Friday, October 13, 2006 12:00 PM PDT
URL: http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127506-pg,1-RSS,RSS/article.html

In a race with rival Advanced Micro Devices, Intel will bring its quad-core chips to market in a new line of Hewlett-Packard workstations due to be introduced on November 13.

HP sent out invitations to the event but did not specify exact models and prices. The computers will probably use Intel's planned Xeon 5300 chip, and will be designed to run high-end applications like seismic analysis and visualization technologies from Ansys, Autodesk, Landmark Graphics, and Parametric Technology.

The launch would mean that Intel brings quad-core processors to market before AMD, a crucial win in a year when Intel has made as many headlines for its layoffs and missed earnings targets as for its technology.

AMD in 2007

AMD plans to release its own quad-core chips in the middle of 2007, and claims its monolithic design is superior to Intel's plan, which essentially glues two dual-cores chips together. But without having any hardware to test, analysts are divided on whether this detail will significantly affect the chips' performance.

Intel Chief Executive Paul Otellini defended the company's design at last month's Intel Developer Forum, saying that customers would care more about the pure speed and performance of their computers than about how the chips inside it are packaged.

Compared to the ratcheting of clock speeds in conventional chips above 3 GHz and 4 GHz, multiple-core chips can accelerate processing tasks in desktops and servers without drawing more electricity and generating extra heat. They can also handle more than one instruction set at a time, allowing computers to multitask more efficiently.

The game enthusiast market will be a testing ground for the first quad-core chips, as Intel has already arranged to ship its Core 2 Extreme version of the chip to 13 gaming PC vendors, including Dell, Gateway, and VoodooPC, Otellini said at the show. The company plans to ship the Core 2 Quad version for mainstream desktops in the first quarter of 2007.

In contrast, the launch with HP next month will focus on high-end users in the fields of digital content creation, computer-aided engineering and design, and oil and gas exploration.

One of the earliest users of quad-core chips will be the Gates Planetarium at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. HP invited reporters to witness the technology at a November 13 press conference called "Quad Fest."

ToC

Microsoft Details Vista Antipiracy, Activation Tech

Paul Thurrott
URL: http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/93756/93756.html

Microsoft this week revealed how it will protect Windows Vista and Longhorn Server from software pirates. The upcoming OSs will utilize a next-generation version of the controversial Windows Genuine Advantage and Microsoft Product Activation technologies, rebranded under the Microsoft Genuine Software Initiative moniker, to limit the capabilities of pirated Vista versions.

The changes are described in a white paper Microsoft made public on Wednesday (< http://download.microsoft .com/download/c/2/9/c2935f83-1a10-4e4a- a137- c1db829637f5/10-03-06SoftwareProtectionWP.doc>). In the document, Microsoft describes its antipiracy technologies as "innovations" that "protect [Microsoft's] intellectual property and alert consumers to the presences of counterfeit software." But the antipiracy features in Vista and Longhorn Server go far beyond similar features in Windows XP. And given the false positives that have appeared during XP's lifetime, it's hard to know whether this latest antipiracy volley will do more than annoy customers and casual software thieves.

Cori Hartje, director of Microsoft's Genuine Software Initiative, admits the company is getting tougher on software pirates. "The upcoming releases of Windows Vista and Windows Server 'Longhorn' will be the first two products to ship with [our] new antipiracy innovations, counterfeit detection, and tamper-resistant features," she says. "Windows Vista and Windows Server 'Longhorn' [have] new ways ... to activate, validate as genuine, and behave when tampered with or hacked."

Those new behaviors are sure to raise concerns among Microsoft's customers. Today, if XP suspects that the system has been pirated, it will display annoying Windows Genuine Advantage advertisements until the problem is corrected. But Vista and Longhorn Server will actually turn off functionality if the system is considered pirated. Features such as the Windows Aero UI, Windows ReadyBoost, Windows Defender, and Microsoft Windows Update will either stop working or won't work fully.

Additionally, systems that aren't activated within 30 days of purchase will move into a reduced-functionality mode in which users can access only Microsoft Internet Explorer and the Windows shell, so that they'll be able to perform only system management functions such as backing up files. Users won't be able to open documents or other files or run applications within a nonactivated system.

Microsoft is also extending its reviled Product Activation technology to businesses through Microsoft Volume Activation 2.0. "This helps provide a more secure deployment solution with multiple, flexible options for customers using volume-license keys to deploy many installations of the Windows Vista operating system in one location," Hartje says. "This process can be done in batches or individually by PC." Volume Activation is designed to prevent volume-license product keys from being leaked outside of corporations, Microsoft says, a common problem with XP.

ToC

[Editor's Note: My thanks to Kevin Hisel for the contributions to this section of the newsletter above. The selection below was recommended on a mailisting I frequent.]

ToC

Spyware, Bots, Rootkits Flooding Through Unpatched IE Hole

September 19, 2006
By Ryan Naraine
URL: http://www.eweek.com/print_article2/0,1217,a=189005,00.asp

The newest zero-day flaw in the Microsoft Windows implementation of the Vector Markup Language is being used to flood infected machines with a massive collection of bots, Trojan downloaders, spyware and rootkits.

Less than 24 hours after researchers at Sunbelt Software discovered an active malware attack against fully patched versions of Windows, virus hunters say the Web-based exploits are serving up botnet-building Trojans and installations of ad-serving spyware.

"This is a massive malware run," says Roger Thompson, chief technical officer at Atlanta-based Exploit Prevention Labs. In an interview with eWEEK, Thompson confirmed the drive-by attacks are hosing infected machines with browser tool bars and spyware programs with stealth rootkit capabilities.

The laundry list of malware programs seeded on Russian porn sites also includes a dangerous keystroke logger capable of stealing data from computers and a banker Trojan that specifically hijacks log-in information from financial Web sites.

According to Sunbelt Software researcher Eric Sites, the list of malware programs includes VirtuMonde, an ad-serving program that triggers pop-ups from Internet Explorer; Claria.GAIN.CommonElements, an adware utility; AvenueMedia.InternetOptimizer; and several browser plug-ins and tool bars and variants of the virulent Spybot worm.

eWEEK has confirmed the flaw-and zero-day attacks-on a fully patched version of Windows XP SP2 running IE 6.0. There are at least three sites hosting the malicious executables, which are being served up on a rotational basis.

In some cases, a visit to the site turns up an error message that reads simply: "Err: this user is already attacked."

The attack is closely linked to the WebAttacker do-it-yourself spyware installation tool kit. On one of the maliciously rigged Web sites, the attack code even goes as far as referencing the way Microsoft identifies its security patches, confirming fears that a well-organized crime ring is behind the attacks.

The URL that's serving up the exploit includes the following: "MS06-XMLNS&SP2," a clear reference to the fact that the flaw is a zero-day that will trigger a quick patch from Microsoft.

A Microsoft spokesman said the company is aware of the public release of detailed exploit code that could be used to exploit this vulnerability. "Based on our investigation, this exploit code could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the user's system. Microsoft is aware of limited attacks that attempt to exploit the vulnerability," the spokesman said in a statement sent to eWEEK.

The company plans to ship an IE patch as part of its October batch of updates due Oct. 10. An emergency, out-of-cycle patch could be released if the attacks escalate.

Microsoft has added signature-based detection to its Windows OneCare anti-virus product. A formal security advisory with pre-patch workarounds will be posted within the next 24 hours.

Check out eWEEK.com's Security Center for the latest security news, reviews and analysis. And for insights on security coverage around the Web, take a look at eWEEK.com Security Center Editor Larry Seltzer's Weblog.

<http://blog.eweek.com/blogs/larry%5Fseltzer/>

ToC

The Linux Section:

Investor outlines SCO-Microsoft link

By Stephen Shankland
Story last modified Mon Oct 09 18:57:26 PDT 2006
URL: http://news.com.com/Investor+outlines+SCO-Microsoft+link/2100-7344_3-6124125.html

A former investor in the SCO Group has identified a Microsoft executive who, he said, worked to "backstop" a funding deal that ultimately helped SCO pursue its legal case against the Linux operating system.

The investor, BayStar Capital managing partner Lawrence Goldfarb, first called attention to Microsoft's involvement in BayStar's $50 million investment in the SCO Group more than two years ago.

<http://news.com.com//Investment+firm+confirms+Microsoft+link+to+SCO/2100-7344_3-5172426.html?tag=nl>
<http://news.com.com//SCO+gets+50+million+investment/2100-7344_3-5092702.html?tag=nl>

The BayStar-arranged funding, which included $20 million from the venture fund and $30 million from the Royal Bank of Canada, was instrumental in SCO's expensive lawsuit against IBM, in which it alleges Big Blue moved proprietary Unix technology into open-source Linux against the terms of its Unix contract with SCO.

Now, in a sworn declaration described in an IBM court filing, Goldfarb said he discussed SCO funding arrangements with Richard Emerson, a Microsoft senior vice president. In 2000, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer named Emerson to lead the software giant's corporate development and strategy, putting him in charge of its mergers, acquisitions and partnerships.

"Mr. Emerson and I discussed a variety of investment structures wherein Microsoft would 'backstop', or guarantee in some way, BayStar's investment...Microsoft assured me that it would in some way guarantee BayStar's investment in SCO," Goldfarb said in the declaration.

The assertion indicates that at least one person at Microsoft apparently was working, at least indirectly, to support SCO's case against a mutual rival, the Linux operating system. SCO Chief Executive Darl McBride said the $50 million investment arranged by BayStar brought the company's legal "war chest" to $60 million.

A Microsoft representative didn't specifically deny the BayStar-Microsoft talks. However, the company said in a statement, "Microsoft has no financial relationship with BayStar and never agreed to guarantee any of BayStar's $50 million investment in SCO. The BayStar declaration confirms that no guarantee was ever provided."

Goldfarb's comments were disclosed over the weekend at the SCO-watcher legal Web site Groklaw.

<http://dw.com.com/redir?destUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.groklaw.net%2Farticle.php%3Fstory%3D2006100801442692&siteId=3&oId=/SCO+gets+50+million+investment/2100-7344_3-5092702.html&ontId=1001&lop=nl.ex>

Goldfarb's declaration indicates Microsoft was indeed willing to help SCO attack Linux, said Allonn Levy, litigation attorney with Hopkins & Carley, a San Jose, Calif.-based law firm.

"Although the declaration does not indicate any actual money was paid by Microsoft, it does suggest that the software behemoth was operating behind the scenes, employing its extensive industry contacts in an apparent effort to help SCO finance its lawsuits," Levy said. "Certainly, Microsoft has an obvious interest in promoting the lawsuits, since the lawsuits are seen as an effort to undermine the legitimacy of the Linux operating system."

After BayStar made the investment, Goldfarb said, "Microsoft stopped returning my phone calls and e-mails, and to the best of my knowledge, Mr. Emerson was fired from Microsoft."

Emerson couldn't immediately be located for comment. Microsoft confirmed he no longer works for the company but wouldn't give details of the circumstances of his departure.

BayStar's relationship with SCO has floundered. The investor wanted SCO to focus totally on litigation, while SCO insisted on continuing its Unix business. By mid-2004, the two companies had parted ways.

In his declaration, Goldfarb said that BayStar had sold its stake back to SCO because SCO's stock price was falling and because the company was rapidly spending its cash pile. He also indicated that Microsoft had cooled on its earlier offer of support.

SCO's case hasn't just hit IBM. The Lindon, Utah-based company also sued Linux user AutoZone, Unix licensee DaimlerChrysler, and is tangling with Novell, which claims that it never sold its Unix copyrights to SCO.

[Graeme Wearden of ZDNet UK contributed to this report from London.]

<http://dw.com.com/redir?destUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.zdnet.co.uk%2F&siteId=3&oId=/SCO+gets+50+million+investment/2100-7344_3-5092702.html&ontId=1001&lop=nl.ex>

In other news:

<http://news.com.com/Google+makes+video+play+with+YouTube+buy/2100-1030_3-6124094.html?tag=st.txt.caro>

<http://news.com.com/Fiorina+says+board+let+emotion+trump+reason/2008-1001_3-6124044.html?tag=nefd.lede?tag=st.txt.caro>

<http://news.com.com/In+the+home+stretch+toward+Vista/2009-1016_3-6124001.html?tag=st.txt.caro>

<http://news.com.com/News.com+Extra/2001-9373_3-0.html?tag=st.txt.caro>
ToC

The Macintosh Section:

Apple Updates iPods, Introduces Movies, Previews iTV

by TidBITS Staff <editors@tidbits.com
>article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8676>
TidBITS#847/18-Sep-06

At Apple's "It's Showtime!" special event last week, CEO Steve Jobs led off by introducing a slate of revised iPods that retain the existing model names. He also introduced, as widely expected, movies to the iTunes Store, along with a new version of iTunes to manage it all. And in an unusual move for Apple, he pre-announced a wireless set-top box - code-named iTV - scheduled to ship in the first quarter of 2007. In order, then...

New iPods

The model with the least amount of change is the video-capable iPod, which retains the same design (available in black and white) as the previous version. However, Apple has improved battery life, claiming up to 3.5 hours of video playback, up from 2 hours, or up to 20 hours of music playback. The screen is also now 60 percent brighter. The iPod is available in a 30 GB version for $250 or an 80 GB version for $350; those prices, incidentally, are $50 cheaper than the previous models, which offered 30 GB and 60 GB capacities.

<http://www.apple.com/ipod/>

Apple's most successful music player, the iPod nano, arrived in a passel of colors: green, silver, black, blue, and pink, all of which are now anodized aluminum instead of plastic and evoke the look of the late iPod mini. The screen is 40 percent brighter than previous models, and Apple claims up to 24 hours of battery life for music playback. The iPod nano comes in a 2 GB capacity for $150, 4 GB for $200, and 8 GB for $250. However, Apple continues to be selective about its color offerings: the 2 GB model is available only in silver, and the 8 GB model is available only in black; the 4 GB model comes in silver, green, blue, and pink.

<http://www.apple.com/ipodnano/>

The iPod shuffle, which gives Apple a low-end answer to those competing MP3 players that haven't yet been crushed, is now available in a single 1 GB model for $80. The iPod shuffle is quite a bit smaller now - 1.62 inches (4.11 cm) wide by 1.07 inches (2.72 cm) tall - and its white exterior has been replaced with an aluminum skin with a built-in clip for attaching to clothing. It will ship in October.

<http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/>

(It's also worth noting that the packaging for the iPod nano and iPod shuffle is much smaller than in the past, a waste reduction move we applaud.)

The new iPod and iPod nano both have a new "instant search" feature that uses the click-wheel to cycle through letters of the alphabet to spell the start of a song or artist. Also new are games: iPod users can now download a variety of casual games from the iTunes Store for $5 each. Games currently available include Tetris, Vortex, Pac-Man, Cubis 2, Zuma, Texas Hold'em, Mini Golf, Mahjong, and Bejeweled. Although the search feature is available only on these newest iPods, the previous 5G iPod is also compatible with the games. Games cannot be played in iTunes.

iTunes 7

As expected in situations that involve changes to the iTunes Store, Apple also rolled out a major update to iTunes. On launch, iTunes 7 alerts you to a welcome new feature - automatic addition of album art to songs already in your library. Then iTunes updates your library, presumably just transitioning to a new database format internally, followed by a long pass to identify songs that need the new "gapless playback" assigned to them. It turns out that gapless playback is always on in iTunes 7. Songs that aren't gapless usually have a little dead air at the beginning or the end of the encoding, which remains (and if they lack that dead air, the transition between songs still usually sounds fine). Truly gapless songs have sound from the start to the end of the file, so the identification pass looks at each file to determine exactly when the audible data starts to eliminate a very slight bit of dead air that occurs when the audio decoder is starting up. You can continue working while gapless playback identification is happening, luckily, since it's quite slow.

<http://www.apple.com/itunes/overview/>
<http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304362>

iTunes 7 features some new navigational tools that should make it easier to work through the different types of media that have become commonplace in the program. The source pane now has different sections with all-cap headings for Library, Store, and Playlists; Devices shows up when an iPod is connected. Library includes entries for Music, Movies, TV Shows, Podcasts, Audiobooks, and Radio (in fact, iPod Games can appear there too, and all the items are optional). Store has the iTunes Store link, along with the Purchased playlist. And Playlists holds your playlists. Gone are the buttons at the top of the screen that let you, for instance, select between TV shows and music videos when the Videos source item was selected.

<http://www.apple.com/itunes/jukebox/sourcelist.html>

More striking, though somewhat less functional, are the three views: list, grouped, and Cover Flow, controlled by buttons to the left of the Search field. List view is what we've all become accustomed to. Grouped view collects songs by album and TV episodes by show, showing the artwork to the left of the group; it's not available for podcasts or radio. Cover Flow provides a new, resizable pane that displays album covers as though they were CD cases standing on a highly reflective black table. The contents of the center-most item in the fanned-out list show in a list view below, and a horizontal scroll bar lets you flip rapidly through your collection; sorting the list (by clicking a column heading) changes the items in the artwork pane, too. It's eye candy, to be sure, but we anticipate it being useful when you want to browse randomly through your music collection. In an interesting and unusual move for Apple, Cover Flow was purchased from independent developer Jonathan del Strother.

<http://www.apple.com/itunes/jukebox/coverflow.html>
<http://www.steelskies.com/coverflow/>

If you don't have artwork for many of your albums, never fear, because Apple now makes album art available for your music for free, even for previously ripped albums (although the selection is limited to songs in the iTunes Store catalog). If you used a utility to snag low-res album art already, you may want to delete it first by selecting multiple items, choosing File > Get Info, selecting the Artwork checkbox (but don't put anything in it), and then clicking OK. Once that's done, Control-click the selected items again and choose Get Album Artwork. (The Clear Downloaded Artwork command currently works only on artwork downloaded from Apple.)

Functionally speaking, iTunes 7 brings one extremely welcome feature, though with an unfortunate limitation. If you've wanted to synchronize music or videos between computers using your iPod in the past, you've been out of luck (although various third party utilities made this possible). iTunes 7 now synchronizes purchased content between computers, so if you download a song or TV show on one computer, plugging the iPod into another authorized computer makes it possible to copy the content to that computer. While this is a promising feature, it works only with purchased content, not with music you've ripped from your own CDs.

<http://www.apple.com/itunes/sync/transfer.html>

As far as we can tell, iTunes 7 in no way improves the situation of a family that wants to have a single music archive that's shared by multiple computers. Built-in sharing works poorly because only one computer can make playlists, rate songs, and so on, and maintaining a shared music folder on a centralized server works acceptably, but each computer must add new music manually. The one new feature here is that iTunes now supports multiple libraries like iPhoto does; hold down the Option key when launching iTunes to create or switch between libraries. The only real utility we can see to this feature, though, is having a relatively small library on a laptop for traveling, but having another library that points at a shared storage folder when you're at home.

In a nice touch, iTunes now provides a tabbed iPod summary page that summarizes all the information about your iPod, including name, free space, serial number, contents, and so on. (Click the Capacity bar to toggle between viewing space used and number of items.) Plus, iTunes now handles iPod software updates, eliminating the awkward iPod Updater utility and the need to download updates for iPod models you don't own.

<http://www.apple.com/itunes/sync/summary.html>

iTunes Store

As expected, Steve Jobs's "One more thing..." announcement was indeed the addition of movies to the iTunes Store (note that Apple dropped "Music" from the name). Jobs announced that the iTunes Store now carries 75 films from Disney, Pixar, Touchstone, and Miramax, all of which are owned by Disney. He also promised that Apple would be adding movies every week, although the real question is whether Apple will be able to negotiate agreements with other movie studios. For now, the movies are available only in the United States, with international distribution anticipated for 2007.

In terms of pricing, most older movies are $10, with new releases priced at $13 for pre-orders and the first week of distribution, after which they'll jump to $15. Prices are comparable to the new Amazon Unbox Video service announced last week. Amazon Unbox Video has a larger selection from studios other than those Disney owns, but it's a moot point for Mac users, since Amazon's service uses Windows Media Player's digital rights management, which isn't compatible with Macs or iPods.

<http://www.amazon.com/b/?&node=16261631>

The movies are encoded in what Apple calls "near DVD quality" and have Dolby surround audio, although we'll leave it to others to wrangle about just how good that really is and whether Apple made the right tradeoffs of quality versus download size. Download time will be slow, for sure, though the details will depend on variables other than just size. TV shows are now encoded at 640 by 480 pixels, up from 320 by 240.

Videos require QuickTime 7.1.3, also released last week, which includes a number of security fixes for maliciously crafted movies that could cause crashes. It's available for Mac OS X 10.3.9 and later, and is a 48 MB download from Apple's Web site or via Software Update.

<http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/mac.html>

These full-length movie purchases have the same limitations as video shorts, music videos, and other visual content: unlike iTunes Store audio purchases, they cannot be burned to disc in a playable format. With music and the online store, burning to an audio CD format was the one way out of the digital rights management world of Apple's FairPlay technology. With video, you can make backups of the files - something that's extremely tedious with DVDs - but you can't play the files anywhere but within iTunes for Mac OS X and Windows and on an iPod. (iTunes 7 now prompts you to back up purchased content after it downloads; the warning can be disabled. Also, a new Back Up to Disc command can be found under the File menu.)

Movies also appear to arrive without extras. For instance, "The Incredibles" has a variety of features and shorts on the DVD that's sold in stores. Those extras aren't noted in any fashion at Apple's store. Amazon.com sells the full-screen 2-disc set for $18 and free domestic shipping; Apple charges $13 (for the first week, then $15), but you appear to get only the movie. Further, the DVD version has English, French, and Spanish subtitles and audio, plus audio commentary (two separate ones). That's a potentially significant difference between the DVD and the download version for some people.

<http://www.amazon.com/Incredibles-Full-Screen-2-Disc-Collector/dp/B0007A2GSW/tidbitselectro00/ref=nosim>

iTV Sneak Peek

Playing with the "one more thing" myth, Jobs paused after introducing the addition of movies to the iTunes Store, said, "One last thing..." and introduced the iTV, a wireless set-top box scheduled to ship sometime in the first quarter of 2007 for $300. The iTV, whose name Jobs said would be changing, is aimed at playing all those videos you watch not just on your computer or iPod, but also on that big flat-screen TV you bought after reading Clark Humphrey's "Take Control of Digital TV." You can certainly hook up a Mac to the TV, but it's inelegant, particularly with all the cabling that's necessary. In essence, the iTV seems to be a super-duper AirPort Express, at least in terms of media sharing and playback.

<http://www.takecontrolbooks.com/digital-tv.html?14@@!pt=TRK-0027-TB847>

The iTV looks like a flattened Mac mini, with wired and wireless networking, USB 2.0, HDMI (High Definition Multimedia Interface), component video, analog audio, and optical audio interfaces. Its software interface is highly reminiscent of Front Row, providing access to movies, TV shows, music, podcasts, and photos and driven via an Apple Remote. The HDMI interface is crucial, since it allows high-resolution digital video data to pass through to the TV in an encrypted form. The movie studios have used HDMI to prevent identical copies of their movies from being pushed out digitally from DVD players. But the use of HDMI also means that only certain approved digital video playing devices can use those high resolutions.

Although no discussion of hard drives or optical drives happened during the keynote, the iTV may need some form of cache storage to support playing video from "selected" Internet sites - and we'd love to hear what "selected" means beyond "it can play QuickTime movie trailers from Apple's site." We'd like to see a YouTube channel, for instance. The lack of a DVD drive is particularly disappointing, because it means that a separate Mac, PC, or DVD player will be needed for DVDs that you might want to view in the same environment. In our view, the iTV should act like a sophisticated media adapter, and thus it would be nice to wire more inputs into it, so only its output would be fed to your TV and stereo system.

<http://www.youtube.com/>

Questions we expect to be answered in the coming months are whether the iTV can pool video and audio from all computers on a local network, or whether limits apply based on iTunes Store authorization and the irritating restriction on how many different users can connect to a copy of iTunes to share music in a given 24-hour period. Also available for discussion is how multiple iTVs would be managed in a home - we expect they'd be addressable by name, just like the AirPort Express and its music streaming feature.

ToC

It's Not Your Parents' (or Even Your) Television

by Glenn Fleishman <glenn@tidbits.com>
article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8677>
TidBITS#847/18-Sep-06

Moderately buried in Apple's iTV announcement last week was the peculiar fact that the future streaming media adapter offers only component and HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface) video output. These two methods of encoding video seemed a little exotic to me, who only recently upgraded the family 19-inch tube TV (10 years old, and failing) to a 20-inch Dell LCD with DVI and what I considered standard video input - a single round plug.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Component_video>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI>

But I'm just out of sync with the rest of the consumer video world, as I suspect many of you are, too. HDMI, I knew, is common on almost all high-definition television (HDTV) sets; it's a superset of the DVI (Digital Video Interface) standard used for external displays. HDMI incorporates comprehensive audio support that DVI lacks, and using a separate standard, it can encrypt digital video and audio to transmit from one licensed device to another, such as between a DVD player and an HDTV set. This is a part of movie studios' and other video copyright holders' digital rights management (DRM) requirement for "allowing" digital copies of their work to be distributed. (All home entertainment equipment with HDMI interfaces deliver the highest resolutions of digital content using encryption. Non-restricted analog outputs are purposely downsampled or degraded to eliminate copying. There are efforts afoot to block unrestricted use of these analog outputs from digital devices, too!)

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Bandwidth_Digital_Content_Protection>
<http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004106.php>

Component video is analog, but considered quite high in quality. In consumer component video, three separate video cables carry the signal. One carries luminance information, which is a combination of brightness (the amount of light energy) and detail. Another cable carries the red component without the luminance values, and a third carries blue minus luminance. Green is inferred from the three components. Because of this separation, images are crisper with more accurate color.

Composite video is what we're all used to, in which chrominance (color) and luminance are combined, forming something that's rather muddy in comparison, but which uses a single cable. This encoding method is the U.S. NTSC standard, which has long been referred to as "Never The Same Color" for its erratic fidelity. The other dominant standard elsewhere in the world is PAL, which is similar.

Although I purchased a relatively recent LCD monitor designed to play video, it turns out that I was already behind the times (though in my defense, my Dell is a computer monitor that I'm using as a television, not a dedicated LCD TV). I checked prices at Crutchfield, a well-regarded online audio/video store, and their least-expensive LCD television set - a $350 15-inch Samsung - supports composite and component video, as well as S-Video and VGA (listed as "PC Input"). (S-Video uses a plug similar to that found on the old ADB (Apple Desktop Bus) keyboard and mouse cables, and is better than composite but not nearly as good as component.)

<http://www.crutchfield.com/S-PiHNqzs6GDH/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=146350&I=305LNR1550>

To check on pricing for a TV with HDMI, I used Crutchfield's link to narrow choices to just displays with that interface; it must be a common search request. Their least-expensive HDMI-bearing set is a Westinghouse 27-inch LCD HDTV for $700; it includes HDMI and two separate component video inputs, composite and S-Video, DVI, and VGA.

<http://www.crutchfield.com/S-PiHNqzs6GDH/cgi-bin/ProdGroup.asp?g=146350&nvpair=AG%5FGeneral%5FFeatures%7CYCHDMI%5FInputs>
<http://www.crutchfield.com/S-PiHNqzs6GDH/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=146350&I=647LTV27W6>

While these aren't expensive options, if you already own a perfectly good TV receiver or LCD monitor for video playback, why buy a new set? Wouldn't a converter work? Unfortunately, no. There's ostensibly no legal way to unwrap the encryption from an HDMI stream and extract the digital content to encode in different ways, such as DVI. Thus, you won't find an adapter for that - and any adapter would require a computer to handle decryption and re-encoding. Component-to-composite conversion, whether S-Video or the single-plug RCA style, requires an NTSC or PAL encoder to change out the video encoding. I've found units for professionals starting over $300, which makes little sense for home users.

Apple has definitely aimed the iTV at early adopters, and it will push some people with older sets over the edge to buy newer ones with the appropriate inputs. That will make consumer electronics makers happy, too, and for all we know Apple is planning an iHDTV that will work directly with the iTV and other products. Remember that most devices called set-top boxes are also TV and cable tuners.

There's another factor at work here, too, which is that component and HDMI encoding make it difficult for an average consumer to extract and record digital video outside of Apple's DRM approach in iTV. Spending some money enables you to record from the component outputs at a decent quality - unless there's some kind of Macrovision or other watermarking code that will be sent out to distort or prevent analog component recording.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macrovision>

But iTV has encoded in its hardware design the notion that, unlike audio, there are a couple of approved and specific ways of viewing video from the adapter. Not including composite output is likely Apple's way of providing yet another sop to the industry that they must simultaneously court and cajole into releasing more digital content to a wider audience.

ToC

Disney Sells 125,000 Movies in First Week on iTunes Store

by Adam C. Engst <ace@tidbits.com>
article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8682>
TidBITS#848/25-Sep-06

Playlist is reporting that Walt Disney President and CEO Robert Iger said that 125,000 downloadable movies had been purchased in the week since Apple's debut of movies on the iTunes Store. That sales level generated $1 million in revenue for Disney, which works out to $8 per movie. This implies Apple is taking in between $2 and $5 per movie since most, if not all, of the movies were in their first week and thus cost either $10 or $13; now most of the newer movies cost $15.

<http://playlistmag.com/news/2006/09/19/disney/>

Playlist also reports Iger as predicting that Disney would receive about $50 million in revenue from selling movies on the iTunes Store in the first year. Extrapolating out from $8 per movie, that would imply that Disney would sell 6.25 million movies via the iTunes Store by this time next year. Those numbers are important, since they need to be high enough to scare other movie studios into wanting to work with Apple or risk leaving big money on the table. No results have yet been forthcoming from the competing Amazon Unbox service, which features movies from studios other than Disney properties.

<http://www.amazon.com/unbox/>

ToC

AirPort Updates Stop Wi-Fi Exploit

by Adam C. Engst <ace@tidbits.com>
article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8683>
TidBITS#848/25-Sep-06

Apple last week released a pair of updates, Security Update 2006-005 and AirPort Update 2006-001, which resolve a trio of related potential exploits in which a local attacker could inject a maliciously crafted frame into a wireless network. In theory, such an attack could cause system crashes, execute arbitrary code, or elevate privileges, though Apple took pains to note that there are no known instances of these exploits. Although you can download the individual updates from the Apple Downloads page (only one is necessary), you must pick the correct one for your machine.

<http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304420>
<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/>

Since AirPort Update 2006-001 covers only two specific builds of Mac OS X 10.4.7 - whereas Security Update 2006-005 handles Mac OS X 10.3.9 and other specific builds of Mac OS X 10.4.7 (with different downloads for 10.3.9 and for PowerPC- and Intel-based Macs running 10.4.7) - we encourage you to let Software Update download the correct version for your system. If you're running Mac OS X 10.3.9 and Software Update doesn't show Security Update 2006-005, you must first install AirPort 4.2 and AirPort Extreme Driver Update 2005-001 (I suspect Software Update will provide them as well).

<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/airport42formacosx1033.html>
<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/airportextremedriverupdate2005001.html>

Although Apple's release notes are terse as usual, these updates undoubtedly come in response to the Wi-Fi exploit demonstrated by David Maynor and Jon Ellch at the Black Hat 2006 conference. Apple did not credit Maynor nor Ellch for these fixes, however, which is an implicit statement that Apple refuses to acknowledge that the two researchers contributed to uncovering the flaws. An Apple spokesperson denied that SecureWorks, the firm for which Maynor works, provided information that led to these patches. Rather, the spokesperson told several media outlets and TidBITS that news of the SecureWorks demonstration prompted Apple to conduct an in-depth code audit that led to identifying these vulnerabilities. (See "Wireless Driver Hack Could Target Macs and Windows," 07-Aug-06 and "Apple Issues Careful Wi-Fi Exploit Denial," 28-Aug-06.) SecureWorks has not responded to any media outlet with additional clarification at press time; the company is also in the middle of a merger, which could be why they're not commenting. What's most important is that Mac users who apply the patches are no longer vulnerable to these particular exploits.

<http://db.tidbits.com/article/8628>
<http://db.tidbits.com/article/8655>

ToC

Mac OS X 10.4.8 Fixes Numerous Issues

by Jeff Carlson <jeffc@tidbits.com>
article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8689>
TidBITS#849/02-Oct-06

The autumn harvest from Apple's programmers came in last week, as Apple updated almost their entire software product line. Although each major application saw revisions, most Mac users will be interested in Mac OS X 10.4.8, a bug-fix update that spans several areas of the operating system.

Notable changes include security enhancements, improved connections using the Apple USB Modem, support for the EAP-FAST protocol to improve wireless network authentication security, better compatibility with third-party USB hubs, better performance on some broadband networks, and improved camera RAW support. Also, Apple has addressed a few bugs that affect Microsoft Office, and fixed a problem where Rosetta code translation on Intel-based Macs could be inaccurate.

<http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304200>

The coolest new feature is that if you hold down the Control key while scrolling with a scroll wheel (or a pseudo scroll wheel, such as is provided by Raging Menace's Side Track utility), the screen zooms smoothly. Screen zooming has been available for a long time (see the Universal Access preference pane), but using keyboard shortcuts to zoom in and out is awkward. Scroll wheel-based zooming, which you can control in the Mouse view of the Keyboard & Mouse preference pane (and where you can also choose another modifier key besides Control), will be a boon to anyone with less-than-perfect eyesight or presenters who want to focus on a particular aspect of the screen.

<http://www.ragingmenace.com/software/sidetrack/>

Mac OS X 10.4.8's release notes were chatty, for Apple, but we're still pondering several of the items, such as "Windows File Sharing now generates only one process, avoiding an issue that could cause a Mac OS X computer to become unresponsive if it won a master browser election" - might a recount help?

Then there's "Resolves an issue in which a Finder alert message with the buttons 'Initialize', 'Ignore', and 'Eject' might not appear after connecting a partitioned FireWire hard drive." We generally prefer not seeing that dialog when we connect FireWire hard drives of any sort, other than uninitialized ones.

And although Apple does explain this next comment in a link, our first reading had us desperately trying to recall our classes in theoretical physics: "Improves Apple File Sharing client performance by changing the default AFP WAN quantum size."

The update is available in several forms, depending on your machine. Software Update should deliver the correct version, but updaters are also available as stand-alone downloads. For the Intel updates, Apple notes that the computer will restart twice after the update has been applied. As with all system updates, we recommend making a backup before proceeding. You can find the updaters here:

ToC

iTunes 7.0.1, iLife '06, iWork '06 Updated

by Jeff Carlson <jeffc@tidbits.com>
article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8690>
TidBITS#849/02-Oct-06

Apple has released a maintenance update for iTunes 7 that deals with a variety of issues in the initial release. According to Apple, iTunes 7.0.1 "addresses stability and performance issues with Cover Flow, CD importing, iPod syncing, and more." Windows users were apparently hit harder with iTunes 7.0, so we hope this release solves those issues as well. iTunes 7.0.1 is available via Software Update or as a 25 MB download.

<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/itunes701.html>

The programs that make up iLife '06 and iWork '06 add interoperability with Aperture 1.5 (see "Aperture 1.5 Faces Latest Lightroom Beta at Photokina," 02-Oct-06). The following updaters are available via Software Update or as separate stand-alone downloads: iMovie HD 6.0.3 (7.1 MB), iWeb 1.1.2 (23 MB), iDVD 6.0.3 (7.2 MB), GarageBand 3.0.4 (30 MB), iPhoto 6.0.5 (80 MB), Keynote 3.0.2 (2.7 MB), and Pages 2.0.2 (2.8 MB). The iMovie HD update also claims to improve stability and fix a number of unspecified "minor issues," while the iPhoto update also contains new themes for printing calendars, greeting cards, and postcards.

<http://www.apple.com/aperture/>
<http://db.tidbits.com/article/8691>
<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/imoviehd603.html>
<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/iweb112.html>
<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/idvd603.html>
<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/garageband304.html>
<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/iphoto605.html>
<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/keynote302.html>
<http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/pages202.html>

ToC

Hidden iPhoto Import Capability

by Adam C. Engst <ace@tidbits.com>
article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8678>
TidBITS#847/18-Sep-06

This iPhoto trick is truly weird, but it works. It turns out, according to a tip published on MacOSXHints.com, that iPhoto 6 can directly see photos on at least some digital cameras and memory cards. All you have to do is connect your camera to your Mac, or put a memory card in a reader. In iPhoto's Import screen, don't click the Import button, but instead press Return twice. After a moment, iPhoto switches into edit mode, displaying the photos on the camera or card instead of those in the iPhoto Library. Press Escape at that point and you switch to organize mode, with blank thumbnails displayed; double-clicking a thumbnail loads it in edit mode again.

<http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20060811032250907>

You can't edit the photos, but you can, if you're using the Edit Photos in Main Screen option in iPhoto, drag the blank thumbnails to your Library to import the actual photos. Unfortunately, on at least some cameras and cards, the photo dates are lost (mine came in as 31-Dec-00) so it's not a good replacement for Apple's own Image Capture utility for selective import, something that iPhoto has long lacked, embarrassingly enough.

It makes perfect sense that the thumbnails don't appear, since iPhoto normally creates separate thumbnail files when it imports photos, and that step hasn't happened yet. There's no reason it couldn't use a technique like the one in Image Capture, which can display thumbnails before import, so perhaps we're seeing code aimed at creating a selective import feature that didn't make the cut for iPhoto 6.

For what it's worth, Apple, here's how a selective import feature should work. When the user connects a camera or inserts a memory card, iPhoto should launch and display the Import screen as it does now. However, it should fill it with thumbnails of all the photos and movies on the camera. Clicking the Import button would still import everything (and the user shouldn't be forced to wait for all the thumbnails to draw before being able to click Import). But the user should also be able to select an arbitrary set of photos and drag them to the Library to import, or to an album to import and add to that album. If the user later does a full import, iPhoto should recognize that any previously imported photos are duplicates, as it does now, and prompt about importing them again.

ToC

GoLive Booted from Adobe Creative Suite, Acrobat 8 Released

by Glenn Fleishman <glenn@tidbits.com>
article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8679>
TidBITS#847/18-Sep-06

The fate of Web design and management tool Adobe GoLive has been sealed: the program has been booted from Creative Suite, Adobe's bundle of applications designed for print and electronic production professionals. Dreamweaver 8 will replace GoLive CS2 in version 2.3 of Creative Suite, which also has been updated to include Acrobat 8 Professional, announced today and shipping in November. Adobe expects to ship the CS 2.3 bundle in the fourth quarter of 2006.

<http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200609/091806CreativeSuite.html>

Adobe acquired Dreamweaver as part of the Adobe-Macromedia merger last year. Dreamweaver has long been viewed as the tool of choice for creating interactive Web sites that incorporate rich media, database content, and scripting with PHP. GoLive was preferred by designers for its integration with Photoshop, direct support for Acrobat internal linking and PDF creation, and ease of use.

In June, I described a leak that had occurred when an Adobe Europe product manager seemed to be saying that both GoLive and illustration program FreeHand would be dropped. After further examination across three languages and a statement from Adobe, it was clear that GoLive and FreeHand wouldn't be part of Adobe's core programs, but would still be developed. (Today's announcements included no news about FreeHand.)

<http://db.tidbits.com/article/8551>

Adobe says that GoLive will continue to be developed as a standalone program, although it's unclear to what audience it would appeal. Credible rumors indicate GoLive may be revamped to be a friendlier Web design tool, with a focus on entry-level users.

The other update to the Creative Suite is the refresh of Acrobat, now at version 8, which is also offered in a variety of versions. New features are a grab bag of miscellaneous items, many of which are only of interest to users in particular industries. Of note, however, is the capability to remove any hidden metadata, layers, and other invisible information that could reveal more than you want, and "redaction" tools that permanently delete text and images from a PDF file. Acrobat 8 Professional will also allow shared PDF commenting and mark-up among a workgroup.

<http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200609/091806Acrobat.html>
<http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobatpro/upgrade_customer.html>

Adobe has slapped the Acrobat name on the latest version of Macromedia Breeze, now known as Acrobat Connect. Connect is a meeting tool, much like WebX or NetMeeting, that enables all kinds of media - PDFs, images, video - to be pushed to all participants. The basic version allows hosted meetings of up to 15 people with limited media use; a Professional version can be installed on a company's own servers with no preset attendee limit. The Professional version contains a full suite of tools for media sharing, voice over IP, and a variety of reporting tools. The hosted version of Connect ships in November, along with the rest of the Acrobat suite; the Professional version is expected in December.

<http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobatconnect/>

Creative Suite 2.3 has a street price of $1,200 for the premium edition, which includes Acrobat 8 Professional and Dreamweaver. Existing CS2 owners can pay $160 for an upgrade. Owners of any other version or edition of Creative Suite can pay $550 for a full upgrade. Acrobat 8 Professional will cost $450, with upgrades for many previous editions costing $160. Acrobat 8 Standard runs $300, with a variety of upgrades at $100. Acrobat Connect will cost $40 per month per user for the basic hosted version; pricing for the on-site professional flavor wasn't announced. The basic Acrobat Connect will have a free trial running from its release through the end of the year.

Staff Roundtable

We're trying something a little different with this article. Rather than attempt to have one person integrate into the article the kind of internal discussion that inevitably takes place after an announcement of this ilk, we thought we'd let you listen in on our more trenchant thoughts and comments. Glenn and Jeff have significant background with GoLive, having written three editions of "Real World Adobe GoLive," whereas Adam has spent vast amounts of time in Acrobat Professional fiddling with PDF files for Take Control.

<ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/info-mac/info/real-world-golive-6.hqx>

[Glenn Fleishman]: Despite an extremely talented group of people who have been developing GoLive since its CyberStudio days before the Adobe acquisition, the program faltered by release 6.0 several years ago and never recovered its position relative to Dreamweaver. Dreamweaver outpaced GoLive on integrated handling of scripts and database results, while GoLive could only marginally handle these tasks. GoLive 6 included a lot of database integration and scripting preview tools that were all abandoned in GoLive CS, along with any hope of competing directly with Dreamweaver. It's been clear since about 2002 that Adobe management was putting substantially fewer resources behind GoLive than Macromedia was putting behind Dreamweaver. GoLive was never a flagship Adobe product, while Macromedia positioned Dreamweaver alongside Director and Flash as a critical tool.

As for Acrobat, it's becoming ever harder for a mature product to learn new tricks. Much of Adobe's focus in recent years has been the split focus of improving workflow for print production, in which a PDF file is not just an intermediate stage, but is the intermediate and end stage from which the final piece is produced; and workgroup collaboration, where comments and markup are allowed within PDF files so that groups never need to print anything out. Version 8 continues along those lines but seems to offer little that's remarkable, other than perhaps the improved security features.

One might call the "redaction" feature the "oops, we thought it was a Sharpie" feature. Many documents have been converted from, say, Microsoft Word into PDF and then had black marks placed over sensitive areas. But any Acrobat Professional user could remove the black marks to view the underlying text. No more. Deleted items will now be entirely removed from the PDF.

[Jeff Carlson]: I think GoLive is dead, despite Adobe's words. While Adobe continues to claim ongoing development, pulling GoLive out of the Creative Suite is almost certainly a death knell for the program; most people are using it because it's part of Creative Suite (with some others sticking with it from pure inertia). That said, I'm sure some designers will stick with GoLive (assuming it's updated and not turned into something else) because they've developed a familiarity with it, have built templates with it, and otherwise grok its interface - a significant feat. But if I were currently making my living in GoLive, today's announcement would have sealed the long-pondered decision to switch to Dreamweaver.

[Adam C. Engst]: I'm uninterested in GoLive and Dreamweaver, since I decided long ago that learning one of them wasn't really any easier than learning HTML and CSS and working in BBEdit or the text editor of my choice. What interests me more is the announcement of Acrobat 8, since we rely heavily on Acrobat for our Take Control ebooks. From the sound of the press release, Adobe has focused on simplifying Acrobat's interface and enhancing its collaboration tools, which sounds nice, but I'm reserving judgment until I see if they've exorcised the numerous devils in their details.

Using Acrobat Professional to work with PDFs is largely an exercise in constant irritation. For instance, to add a line of linked red text to the bottom of every page, as I do when creating samples of our ebooks, I can create a footer fairly easily, but I must manually change the color of each line to red (because Acrobat doesn't provide color controls for footer text), and I must manually paste and move a copied link into place on each page (since Acrobat doesn't allow footers to contain links, and since pasted links always appear in the middle of the page, rather than in the same relative location as the copied source link). Is it any wonder people create such lousy PDFs when the preeminent tool for working with PDFs makes such simple tasks so difficult? My fingers are crossed for Adobe to get it right with Acrobat 8, but I'm not hopeful, given the number of years they've gotten it wrong so far.

[Glenn Fleishman]: Adam's lack of interest in graphical front ends to Web page building and management highlights one of the key reasons why Dreamweaver has done so well. Most Web sites of any scale now aren't a random collection of individually edited pages. Just like TidBITS and our Web Crossing solution, and, in fact, most blogs, sites are constructed around database-driven templates, which are often extremely difficult to preview outside of specialized tools or a Web page used to edit the template and then view the results. Dreamweaver has reasonable support for previewing scripts, but it is also extensible. What a truly useful Web editing tool would offer now is not just the capability to write and preview in templates - GoLive CS2 has some limited support for Movable Type's format - but the simplicity to write one's own modules to work with programs like Web Crossing that aren't popular enough to warrant direct support. With that kind of support, you could have the power of a visual editor that manages Cascading Style Sheets and helps ensure consistency across all the pages in a site, while still having the power of template-based page creation.

Related link:

The Future Beyond Tomorrow, Courtesy of Adobe

by Glenn Fleishman <glenn@tidbits.com>
article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8684>

ToC

The CUCUG Section:

September General Meeting

reported by Kevin Hopkins (kh2@uiuc.edu)

Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006

President Richard Rollins was not present this evening, so Vice President Emil Cobb conducted the meeting. There were thirteen members in attendance. No officer introductions were necessary.

First off, Emil talked about the new iPods and the new iTunes 7.

Phil Wall asked about Windows Media Player, its Digital Rights Management and how to get around it. Kevin Hisel talked against the FUD of overbearing DRM.

There was a discussion about the program FairUseWM. It works on Windows' DRM but you do have to have the original license key. You can only crack the music you own.

Emil returned to his discussion of iTunes and the album art. You can now download the album art free and automatically with iTunes 7.

VP Cobb opened the floor for any PC News. Kevin Hisel demurred, saying he hadn't boned up before coming to the meeting.

Jon Bjerke told us about Comodo, a free anti-virus, free firewall program. Kevin Hisel pulled up the web site - <http://www.comodogroup.com>.

There was a discussion of Microsoft's Anti-virus Solution. It has Defender in it and is PC Magazine's "Editors' Choice."

Norris Hansell had a puzzling problem with Adobe PDFMaker. He's tried to delete it from his machine but the Adobe site keeps putting it back. He says it makes Office load up slowly. Wayne Hamilton suggested making all the files "read only" so when it tries to reload, it'll error out.

Jerry Feltner said he was having a problem with his computer booting up slowly and then running slower and slower until finally stopping. He was told to reboot and do a virus scan. Kevin Hisel suggested running a spyware checker. Adware is the number one cause of PCs slowing down. Jerry noted that he had found he had over 800 hidden files. The consensus was run Adaware, Windows Defender, and Spybot Search and Destroy. Another suggestion was visiting <http://safety.live.com> (requires IE). It's the site of Windows Live OneCare. "Find and fix safety and performance issues on your PC for free online with Windows Live OneCare safety scanner."

Tuning to post break activities, Vice President Emil Cobb asked what was scheduled for the PC SIG this evening. Kevin Hisel said the PC SIG would be viewing a PowerPoint presentation on Windows Vista. He noted that Jon Bjerke has it running on his laptop, so people will be able to get a look at it personally. Kevin said a P3 800 with 512 MB minimum is the recommended system that is required. The PC SIG will also be looking at the new version of Picassa.

Emill said the Mac SIG would be looking at HandBrake, a program for ripping commercial DVDs, and iSquint for compressing DVDs to put on your video iPod.

The Macintosh SIG: Emil Cobb Shows Handbrake and iSquint

The first thing Emil showed was Handbrake. He got it from Version Tracker.com. The program is freeware. Handbrake rips a DVD to a QuickTime MP4 file. Emil showed how this worked with "Catwoman." It produced a 982 MB. file. Handbrake does just the movie, not any extras. Handbrake 1.71 is the latest version of the program. It requires system 10.39.

Emil then revealed that OSX has Tetris built into it. If you go to Terminal and run eMacs, press Escape X, and type in Tetris, the game will show up. This little Easter Egg was brought to you comp[liments of <http://www.eeggs.com/items/43501.html> .

Emil then discussed iSquint 4.3. He hasn't used it yet, because he presently does have a video iPod, but iSquint works hand and hand with Handbrake to converts a Quicktime movie file into video iPod format. iSquint is freeware and he got it from Version Tracker.

In the waning moments of the SIG meeting, Edwin Hadley showed us some pictures he downloaded from <http://www.ExtremeInstability.com> . There were some stunning storm chaser photos on that site.

ToC

September Board Meeting

reported by Kevin Hopkins (kh2@uiuc.edu)

The September meeting of the CUCUG executive board took place on Tuesday, September 26, 2006, at 7PM, at Kevin Hisel's house. (For anyone wishing to attend - which is encouraged, by the way - the address and phone number are both in the book). Present at the meeting were: Richard Rollins, Emil Cobb, Kevin Hopkins, Kevin Hisel, and Rich Hall.

Kevin Hisel: Kevin related to Richard the troubles he had with the equipment during the PC SIG. He said the mouse and keyboard would lock up. He downloaded a bunch of updates, rebooted, and it locked up permanently. Rich said he would look at the machine.

Richard Rollins: Richard said he will not be at the next meeting again. He'll be at the Blue Man Group concert.

During a discussion, Richard noted that GRC.com's SpinRite is a wonderful, wonderful program. As long as it isn't physical damage, Spin Rite will recover a sick hard drive.

Kevin Hopkins: Kevin brought in a DVD he had recorded with his stand alone LiteOn DVD recorder. The disk would play through WinDVD, but he was unable to back it up with DVDShrink because of it's menu structure. Kevin wanted to archive the TV shows recorded on a DVD-RW onto a DVD-R, in order to put the RW back into service. Kevin Hisel was able to copy the disc with Nero Recode.

Kevin Hisel: Kevin continued his report on the PC SIG. He said Jon Bjerke showed Windows Vista on his laptop, but he could never open the disk to show the PowerPoint of Vista.

There had been a discussion about the Next Generation Security machine. Kevin chalked it up to a bunch of Conspiracy theory talk.

Kevin finished by saying the meeting was a minor disaster but OK.

Richard Rollins: Richard said he would show off Quicksilver for the Mac SIG and Netdrive for the PC SIG (free program from Novell) in November.

ToC

The Back Page:

The CUCUG is a not-for-profit corporation, originally organized in 1983 to support and advance the knowledge of area Commodore computer users. We've grown since then, now supporting PC, Macintosh and Linux platforms.

Meetings are held the third Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the First Baptist Church of Champaign in Savoy. The FBC-CS is located at 1602 N. Prospect Avenue in Savoy, on the NE corner of Burwash and Prospect. To get to the the First Baptist Church from Champaign or Urbana, take Prospect Avenue south. Setting the trip meter in your car to zero at the corner of Kirby/Florida and Prospect in Champaign (Marathon station on the SW corner), you only go 1.6 miles south. Windsor will be at the one mile mark. The Savoy village sign (on the right) will be at the 1.4 mile mark. Burwash is at the 1.6 mile mark. The Windsor of Savoy retirement community is just to the south; Burwash Park is to the east. Turn east (left) on Burwash. The FBC-CS parking lot entrance is on the north (left) side of Burwash. Enter by the double doors at the eastern end of the building's south side. A map can be found on the CUCUG website at <http://www.cucug.org/meeting.html>. The First Baptist Church of Champaign is also on the web at <http://www.fbc-cs.org> .

Membership dues for individuals are $20 annually; prorated to $10 at mid year.

Our monthly newsletter, the Status Register, is delivered by email. All recent editions are available on our WWW site. To initiate a user group exchange, just send us your newsletter or contact our editor via email. As a matter of CUCUG policy, an exchange partner will be dropped after three months of no contact.

For further information, please attend the next meeting as our guest, or contact one of our officers (all at area code 217):

   President/WinSIG:   Richard Rollins      469-2616
   Vice-Pres/MacSIG:   Emil Cobb            398-0149               e-cobb@uiuc.edu
   Secretary/Editor:   Kevin Hopkins        356-5026                  kh2@uiuc.edu
   Treasurer:          Richard Hall         344-8687              rjhall1@uiuc.edu
   Corp.Agent/Web:     Kevin Hisel          406-948-1999           contact/index.html
   Linux SIG:          Allen Byrne          344-5311              adbyrne@ieee.org

Email us at <http://www.cucug.org/contact/index.html>, visit our web site at <http://www.cucug.org/>, or join in our online forums at <http://www.cucug.org/starship/> .

CUCUG
912 Stratford Drive
Champaign, IL
61821-4137

ToC